Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

Educational Blogs


Click to Search Blog Archives

Archives

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Highlows pass as patent leathers, jackdaws strut in peacock feathers…

August 31, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 10:41 AM

The teachers' unions are at heart industrial unions - but their members are highly-skilled, well-educated professionals. As a result, these unions feature a number of built-in contradictions.

Some of the contradictions are so obvious that they hardly need be mentioned, For example, the teachers' unions position themselves as being on the side of the students - but fight to keep kids in classrooms with bad teachers. The unions claim that teaching is an extremely important job - but block higher wages for the best teachers and say that there's not much teachers can do with disadvantaged students. The unions maintain that teachers are well-educated, highly-trained professionals - but insist they be treated like blue-collar workers.

Some of the other contradictions are less obvious. For example, the teachers' unions position themselves as enlightened, progressive organizations that are looking to a better future, but in fact their policies are extremely conservative - in the sense that they try to maintain status-quo education policies. The teachers' unions slam big business repeatedly, but they are themselves big businesses with large staffs and huge revenues. The teachers' unions align themselves with left-of-centre political parties, but their policies hurt most the left's traditional constituents - the poor and needy. 

These contradictions are just a beginning. I would be glad if readers would point out some more.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Big Labour

August 30, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:50 AM

The speaker in this video is the author of a book in our lending library, reviewed in our blog here. Dr. Moe is a Stanford professor whose specialty is public bureacracy and the theory of political institutions. Tomorrow, I plan to blog about some of the contradictions inherent in the teachers' unions.



SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Teachers should be treated like professionals

August 29, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:24 AM

Another small mystery solved! I have long wondered why unions cling so hard to their beloved grid, insisting that their members be paid in a lockstep fashion regardless of merit. How could this possibly matter to them? Well, here is the answer, courtesy of Steven Brill's Class Warfare (p. 199).

"As a general matter, union leaders depend on the union contract being the most important thing in their members' work lives. Treating all teachers the same, regardless of performance, as if they were workers on an assembly line, gives union leaders exactly that lead role. Letting teachers determine their own fates based on their performance would give each teacher - or management, if you believed management was capricious or unfair - the lead role."

This is another example of a policy that is good for the union, but not for its members.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Sunday at the Movies (Evolution)

August 28, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:49 AM

The 50 candidates for Miss USA this year were asked whether they think evolution should be taught in school. For the most part, they think that both evolution and creationism should be taught, giving students the chance to make up their minds for themselves - a perfect example of the dominant educational belief that kids should be taught that they are all entitled to their own opinions and that teachers should not be telling them what to think.



SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

The nanny state

The nanny state
August 27, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 01:01 PM

This story in today's Globe and Mail provides a real-life example of what can happen when government moves into the private sector. Because the Ontario government's all-day kindergarten program has robbed it of many fee-paying parents, this award-winning nursery school is closing its doors - despite its life-changing reputation. According to the article, this Regent Park nursery school is only the first canary in the cage to fall....

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Washing their hands - of systematic phonics

August 26, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:52 AM

I have often wondered why education leaders resist systematic phonics so fervently, despite the overwhelming research and empircal evidence in its favour. The only reason I have been able to come up with, until now, is that they are simply unwilling to admit they were wrong. Now I have a better explanation, courtesy of an interesting book entitled Brain Bugs: How the brain's flaws shape our lives by Dean Buonomano. This excerpt is from the chapter "Unreasonable Reasoning" (pp. 142-143).

"In the 1840s, in some hospitals, 20 percent of women died after childbirth. These deaths were almost invariably the result of puerperal fever (also called childbed fever): a disease characterized by fever, pus-filled skin eruptions, and generalized infection of the respiratory and urinary tracts. The cause was largely a mystery, but a few physicians in Europe and the United States hit upon the answer. One of them was the Hungarian doctor Ignaz Semmelweis. In 1846 Semmelweis noted that in the First Obstetric Clinic at the Viennese hospital, where doctors and students delivered babies, 13 percent of mothers died in the days following delivery (his carefully kept records show that on some months the rate was as high as 30 percent). However, in the Second Obstetric Clinic of the same hospital, where midwives delivered babies, the death rate was closer to 2 percent.

"As the author Hal Hellman recounts: 'Semmelweis began to suspect the hands of the students and the faculty. These he realized, might go from the innards of a pustulant corpse almost directly into a woman's uterus.' Sommelweis tested his hypothesis by instituting a strict policy regarding cleanliness and saw the puerperal fever rates plummet. Today his findings are considered to be among the most important in in medicine, but two years after his initial study his strategy had still not been implemented in his own hospital. Semmelweis was not able to renew his appointment, and he was forced to leave to start a private practice. Although a few physicians rapidly accepted Semmelweis's ideas, he and others were largely ignored for several more decades, and, by some estimates, 20 percent of the mothers in Parisian hospitals died after delivery in the 1860s. It was only in 1879 that the cause of puerperal fever was largely settled by Louis Pasteur.

"Why were Semmelweis's ideas ignored for decades? The answer to this question is still debated. One factor was clearly that the notion of tiny evil life-forms, totally invisible to the eye, wreaking such havoc on the human body was so alien to people that it was considered preposterous. It has also been suggested that Semmelweis's theory carried emotional baggage that biased physicians' judgments: it required a doctor to accept that he himself had been an agent of death, infecting young mothers with a deadly disease. At least one physician at the time is reported to have committed suicide after coming to terms with what we know today as germ theory. There are undoubtedly many reasons germ theory was not readily embraced, but they are mostly the result of the amalgam of unconscious and irrational forces that influence our rational decisions."

In light of this amazing anecdote, I have formed a new hypothesis concerning educators' unreasoning aversion to systematic phonics - namely that they are protecting themselves from the knowledge that their policies have resulted in misery and blighted lives for untold millions of people.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Don’t worry, it’s just a parent

August 25, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:00 AM

I'm reading this great book, Class Warfare: Inside the fight to fix America's schools by Steven Brill (possibly the US's premier investigative journalist). The author peppers the book with personal stories about the people who are trying to reform American education. With each chapter short, typically only two or three pages, reading the book is like eating salted nuts - you read one chapter and you have to read just one more. Here's a typical anecdote (p. 86).

"August 19, 2002, was Joel Klein's first day on the job as the New York City schools chancellor. Making his way to his office after navigating through the security process at the Board of Education headquarters in Brooklyn (which, after cleaning out two-thirds of the staff, he would soon abandon in favor of a building next to City Hall in Manhattan), Klein saw that a light on his phone console was blinking. 'Don't we need to answer that?' he asked his new assistant, a veteran of the office he had just assumed and someone who, he recalls, looked at him as if certain she'd still be there when he, like the chancellors before him, had departed. 'Oh, no,' she said. 'That's just some parent on hold who called complaining about something. If you let it blink long enough, she'll go away.' It was probably that morning that Klein began using a phrase that he would still repeat to friends multiple times a day eight years into his job: 'You just can't make this stuff up.'"

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Mix and match schooling

August 24, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:00 AM

It's been 150 years or so since public education was invented, and over the years we've come to think of education as proceeding in a straight line - kindergarten, grade school, high school, post-secondary, all in big box schools in classes with 20-odd other students of the same age. But just because we've gotten used to this model doesn't mean it's the only (or best) possibility.

Here's an article about the way that education in Florida is evolving - towards what the author calls "hybrid' schooling. With all the new school choice options now available in Florida, these lucky students can mix and match their schooling to suit their own unique profile - for example, attending classes at more than one specialized school; enrolling in on-line courses, including the Florida Virtual School; and taking dual-enrollment courses at post-secondary institutions.

In addition to the obvious educational benefits of hybrid schooling, this customized approach to education offers students a richer, more varied social experience.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Lighting the way to a brighter future

August 23, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:28 AM

In light of our energetic discussions generated by budgetary short-circuits, here's an electrifying idea for both igniting powerful savings and also sparking environmentally-friendly habits in schools.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Does government really know best?

August 22, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:45 AM

Here's information about a Behind the Spin event of interest to those readers who live in the GTA: Is Government-Run, Taxpayer-Financed Education the Cornerstone of Democracy? Tuesday, September 22. On the one side, Peter Cowley, father of the Fraser Institute school rankings, and on the other side Annie Kidder, mother of People for Education and the parent of a child who attends a publicly-funded school of choice. Although billed as being behind the spin, I suspect there will still be lots of spinning going on - not to mention fur flying!

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›