Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

Educational Blogs


Click to Search Blog Archives

Archives

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Out-Of-Field Teaching Assignments

December 31, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 03:02 PM

Further to John's posting about the importance of teachers having a thorough mastery of their subjects, I thought I would raise the little-known problem of out-of-field assignment - whereby teachers are assigned to teach subjects in which they have little training or education. This happens much more than people realize, possibly stemming from a belief that teaching is teaching and as long as a teacher is good at teaching, he or she will be able to teach any subject. But this is like expecting a brain surgeon to be good at delivering babies or a real estate lawyer to be able to defend someone accused of murder.

Teachers themselves dislike out-of-field assignments and likely principals do too. But principals' hands are tied by the present rigidities in the system - the need to hire only certified teachers, the lack of control over who teaches at their school, the inability to hire part-time teachers, the lack of control over what courses are offered at the school, and so forth. I suspect that if principals were given the same management powers as, say, company CEOs, we would see far fewer out-of-field assignments - and far more student learning as a result (not to mention happier teachers and parents).

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Weighing a pig DOES fatten it!

December 30, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 12:13 PM
A favourite saying of critics of standardized testing is that ?just weighing a pig doesn?t fatten it?. It seems to be part of the canon at faculties of education where it is considered a definitive rebuttal of test proponents. However, a little thought and a thimble full of knowledge of modern quality management practices quickly reveals how fatuous this saying is as the posting below to a QM forum reveals. (If I was a pig farmer experimenting with feeds as much as our schools are experimenting with their teaching methods, I?d be doing a whole lot of weighing!) @Mark ? The act of weighing a pig doesn?t make it any fatter, but consider two farmers. One weighs his pigs every day and charts how much they have gained. The second farmer, doesn?t weigh his pigs or even look at them to see if they are growing. The first farmer?s pigs are almost certainly going to weigh more over time because the farmer is paying attention to the weight and this will modify his behavior in how he takes care of the pigs. A better example is if the farmer was weighing himself.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

So what happens after we?ve got students ?engaged??

December 29, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:44 AM
To be honest with you, I?m glad I?m not a high school teacher any more. I don?t know if I would be up to the challenge of getting today?s highly distracted students ?engaged? with trigonometry or computer science. But I do remember that when I succeeded in interesting my students, invariably discussions would head in the direction of topics more advanced than were being discussed in class. For example, a student?s question in a grade 11 algebra class might lead to a brief discussion of calculus or set theory. This must be happening all the time in today?s elementary schools which leads me to wonder how well teachers who have been taught that process is more important than content are handling these situations. I agree that it?s unrealistic for elementary teachers to have subject matter mastery at, say, the post-secondary level for all the subjects that they teach, but it would be interesting to see how well these teachers would score on tests of their mathematics, science, history, geography and literature knowledge at the grade 10 level.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

What the American Tea Party learned from Canadian Educators

December 28, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 09:23 AM
OK, I?m being facetious with this title ? there?s no way the Tea Party would bother to look northward for any reason ? but there is one troubling way in which the approach that Canadian educators take to their critics consistently mirrors that of the Tea Party. The Tea Party?s one-size-fits all response to attempts to increase taxes on billionaires, introduce a health care system that covers the poor or regulate Wall Street investment bankers is to label such initiatives as ?socialist?. In a very similar way, Canadian educators accuse anyone calling for alternatives to the current educational hegemony of trying to ?privatize? Canadian education. This approach dispenses with the need to do the hard work of actually listening to your opponents to truly understand the points they are making. Coming from a group like the Tea Party, most of whose members believe the universe is 6000 years old, this simplification is lamentably predictable. But coming from a group that is highly educated and charged with educating future generations in Canada, it is simply an abuse of the power that we have (unfortunately) given them.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Your Child Left Behind

December 27, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:47 AM

An article in the December issue of the Atlantic cites state-by-state research by Stanford economist Eric Hanushek to challenge many of the reasons given by educators for the poor showing of American students on international tests.  It would be very interesting to see the Canadian results by province on the chart that illustrates the article. Hanushek also investigated how Massachusetts moved into first place among the states -- primarily by focusing on measuring and acting on outputs rather than inputs.  Although things are better in Canada related to some of the issues mentioned, they all provide food for thought despite the impression left at the end of the article by Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty that we have little to learn from the American situation.

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Sunday at the Movies (Singing Science Teacher)

December 26, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 02:15 PM

You know how you can often remember the words to a song almost effortlessly? Well, this science teacher has taken advantage of this quirk of the human brain and recorded 16 videos of himself singing important science concepts to the tune of popular songs like "Dancing Queen" and "Popular". This video explains the difference between heat and temperature.



SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

National School Choice Week is Coming

National School Choice Week is Coming
December 24, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 11:04 AM

The Society for Quality Education has become a partner in National School Choice Week (January 23-28, 2011)  Its purpose is to highlight effective education options for every child.  This is a U.S. initiative, but we are the Canadian link.  Click on the icon below the menu on the left as well to learn more.

SQE is the only organization devoted to quality education and school choice in Canada. Not a day goes by that we don't receive requests for Stairway to Reading, Stairway to Math, or for Malkin's updated How to Get the Right Education for Your Child.  It is clear that there are lots of people who are dissatisfied with the education their children receive and are looking for alternatives.  SQE continues to provide information on what works.  Over the next few months you will learn more about new initiatives we are working on.  (Hint:  Keep the date of April 26th open!)   In the meantime, check out the site for School Choice Week or our resources and information for parents and teachers, join us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter (@SQESocQualEd) We'd love to get your feedback.   See you in the New Year!

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Measuring Effectiveness

December 23, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 10:22 AM

This article argues why student test scores can't measure teacher effectiveness. Hunh?  The points the author makes sound a lot like the Ontario College of Teachers' Standards of Practice.  She says that it's a teacher's heart - not head - that makes for effective teaching. Teachers should be committed to teaching, make relationships a priority, have an energetic personality, make learning like play.   Excuse me?  I read somewhere that if the only measure of a good teacher was to "like children", then the criterion for being a good surgeon would be to "like to cut things."  Her last point is the most telling--teachers should reinvent themselves and use new pedagogy.  My caveat to that is that the pedagogy should be proven effective practice - as opposed to some new fad that is the flavour of the month, but doesn't work.

Over the Christmas break, we will be posting less often.  Merry Christmas, everyone!

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

Don’t Wait For Spring - Do It Now!

December 22, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 12:08 PM

When the realization first strikes that things are not going well at school, many parents' initial reaction is to ask for changes at the school: asking for the teacher to do something different, asking for special education services, talking to the principal.......  From what I can gather after talking to hundreds of such parents, this rarely works. The mindsets and culture of most schools are usually so well set and interlocking that nothing can budge. 

Now comes a new study from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute that finds that the vast majority of 2,000 low-performing schools (both conventional and charter) did not improve over a five-year period despite strenuous turn-around efforts. 

The message is clear. If you are the parent of a child who is struggling in school, don't waste time trying to get better services for your child at that school. Get your child out of there fast - before he or she falls so far behind that it's almost impossible to ever catch up.

Other school options, and how to go about evaluating them, are outlined in my free book How to get the right education for your child. 

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

The Best Way to Help Students Who Are Slower

The Best Way to Help Students Who Are Slower
December 21, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 01:32 PM

Our very own Stephen Hurley has his own blog. Who knew? Here's a link to his latest posting. Stephen writes about his son's skating lessons, and how his son's teachers are recommending that his son remain in level 2 and not progress to level 3 with most of the children in his original group. It seems the instructors are "firm and confident" in the need for children "to master certain basic skills before proceeding". They say that if kids are moved along too quickly, without proper mastery of the fundamentals, they will eventually hit a wall". Stephen agrees with this decision, and goes on to muse about the value of ability grouping in the primary grades. 

Of course, the problem with ability grouping is that it encourages the achievement gap to widen, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. The Swiss have a different solution, as described in this article from our archives. Essentially, it is to protect all of their students from failure by ensuring that all of the children progress at the same pace - even though it means that more able children progress more slowly than they might, at least at first. 

Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 >