Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

SCHOOL FOR THOUGHT

More magical thinking from the usual suspects

July 27, 2012 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:16 AM

Today’s Globe and Mail has an article that harks back to Rousseau, with a wistful, romantic tone to it. The article advocates for eschewing formal schooling during the summer months, implying that the hiatus will enhance kids’ cognitive performance in the rest of the year.

This is obvious nonsense. These people probably think that their wish will come true when they blow out their birthday candles.

If there is one thing that the research tells us, not to mention common sense, it’s that kids learn what they’re taught. Of course, kids benefit from unstructured enriching experiences like boating or dressing up as a child from 1910. And kids who are already doing well in school will not suffer much of a setback if they take the summer off doing this stuff. 

But for kids who are struggling in school, a summer off will cause their learning deficits to snowball even more. There are 24 hours in a day. If kids sleep 10 of those hours and devote 2 hours to schoolwork, that still leaves 12 hours for the unstructured learning and play advocated by the Globe article. In fact, depending on how severe the child’s learning deficits are, I might go for 3 hours of schoolwork and only 11 hours of unstructured learning and play….

Page 1 of 1 pages