Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Helpful information for the Ontario minister of education

July 24, 2012 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:31 AM

We have blogged before on how the Ontario government has succeeded in lowering the high school drop-out rate by making it easier to graduate from high school (“from a dumbed down curriculum, to credit recovery programs, to automatic bumps for marks as low as 39%, to a requirement that teachers formally defend every failing mark, to prohibitions against deducting marks for late or incomplete assignments, to co-op placements that count as high school credits, and on and on”), but we have to admit that the Ontario government look like pikers compared to some New York high schools, according to this article. 

Somebody should tell the Ontario education minister about New York’s credit recovery program, which lends itself to all kinds of abuses, including letting students Google the answers, write the same test over and over again, or even get friends to write the tests on their behalf. With this approach, students can complete an entire course in just one week.  Clearly, Ontario is missing the boat.

Comments

Credit recovery is an excellent tool.  As I understand, this is implemented in most Boards and private schools all across Ontario. This would be ideal if a student who has amassed 45-49 percent average in a subject and (at the discretion of teacher) was not granted a credit. As a matter of fact, in 2 school boards that I have taught in, such a near percentage to passing can go either way. When you are that close, you conceivably have made some concerted effort (albeit with much difficulty!) in passing. If summer school was not an option for the student, for whatever reason, then the Guidance departments make all earnest efforts ( in case-by-case scenarios) for that student to upgrade.
The ‘bumping’ up from a 39 percent to a passing point indicates that this student has never grasped any of the concepts on a consistent basis. Any school worth their salt should not pass such a student. In fact, our school’s Guidance department (with an noted acumen for enforcing academic standards) will not even consider a student for summer school placement who came in with less than a 40 percent final average.This, unfortunately, is a forfeiture of this subject. Good responsible schools will work with a student to save a credit if it proves to be worthy.

Posted by Steve on 07/24 at 05:37 PM

So Steve - a two week session for credit recovery is an excellent tool?  Fifty-five hour session that amounts to covering only the curriculum outcomes that the individual students did not pass. Now how does that work, covering only the curriculum outcomes that students did not pass, without covering the basic foundation knowledge needed to understand the outcomes that the students have failed or did not meet the magically number of 50 percent or higher.

According to the ministry of education, the rules described in your post are the same ones mandated by the ministry of education. as the policy to keep students in school. In other words, a credit mill, even though the same at-risked students will be in the same place the following school year with no significant changes to the root problems that affect academic achievement.

http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/nr/06.06/memo0628.pdf

A blog called Teachers At Risk - Ontario blog

The post entitled - Are Credit Rescue and Credit Recovery programs avenues for socially promoting high school students so they don’t drop out of high school?
http://www.teachersatrisk.com/2012/05/18/are-credit-rescue-and-credit-recovery-programs-avenues-for-socially-promoting-high-school-students-so-they-dont-drop-out-of-school/

And in my personal opinion, as a veteran parent for well over 35 years, there would be no need for credit recovery programs, if the education system taught all students to become competent in reading, writing and numeracy. If the students have a solid foundation, it is much easier to motivate students with weaker academic achievement, than it is with students who have a shaky foundation in the basics of the 3 Rs.

Posted by Nancy on 07/25 at 02:50 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: