Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Are summer breaks obsolete?

November 17, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:55 AM

(Guest blog by Elaine Hirsch, a writer for onlineschools.org who frequently writes for other blogs)

Summer break has become such a traditional part of the annual school calendar that students even sing songs about it. However, summer break is a tradition that needs to end if schools are serious about increasing student achievement. The factors that once led schools to implement extended summer breaks no longer exist, and summer breaks have proven to impede learning and disproportionately harm our most vulnerable students.

It’s a common misconception that summer breaks originated in America’s agrarian communities, where farms often depended on the labour of children. In fact, agrarian schools often had fall breaks, so students could help bring in the harvest. Summer breaks actually originated in urban schools, where administrators believed school buildings were too hot and poorly-ventilated to be attended during the peak summer months. Further, some physicians believed longer school years would cause mental fatigue and student burnout.

Modern cooling and ventilation systems now make schools comfortable year-round, and research has shown students have both the physical and psychological strength to endure longer school years. The traditional motivations for offering students extended summer breaks no longer make much sense.

In fact, evidence shows summer breaks hinder student achievement, particularly among at-risk student populations. Studies indicate that over the summer students regress the equivalent of one month of instruction in math and literacy. That means on average America’s students begin each school year knowing less than they did when the previous school year ended. This phenomenon, called summer loss, is even more pronounced for students who live in poverty.

School districts that have experimented with longer school years have experienced improvements in student achievement. A study by the National Center on Time and Learning found school districts with longer school years and school days witnessed increases in standardized test scores and graduation rates.

The Knowledge is Power Program charter school network has used extended school years to help students who may be years behind their peers in math, science, and reading, and several California elementary schools with year-round schooling have seen significant increases in reading scores. University of Minnesota researchers analyzed several studies on year-round schooling and found such schedules consistently demonstrated increases in reading and math scores.

The success of year-round schooling has several school districts, particularly districts plagued by low student achievement, seriously considering eliminating summer breaks. Educators are waking up to the concept that summer breaks are an idea from another century, and that they probably should have stayed there.

Comments

I kept my kids working all summer on math, spelling, writing, and reading.  They also did their swimming in the summer.  Mothers would get their kids together in the neighbourhood, and spend a couple of hours in the a.m. doing the rudiments.  We lived in a small town, so afterwards, the kids would play in the woods and fields…  They’d have great summers.
The problems were always back at school.  With no accountability, we as parents never knew what the teachers were doing, as they lacked incentive to get through the curricula—stressful seeing our children waste their time where they were supposed to be learning.
My conclusion is the obvious—summers off wouldn’t be as harmful if children were taught properly.

Posted by Bev on 11/17 at 09:14 AM

Interesting that the topic is being raised now - along with tuition fees.  For the last several years, students have complained about the high cost of post-secondary education in Canada.  For the other 99% of us who don’t have rich parents, we needed this time in the summer to earn money to pay our way through university.

BTW:  this post neatly ties into yesterday’s.  One reason that students are ELECTING (yes, it is their choice, we do live in a democracy) to do their high school in 5 years, not four (and they are only taking 30 credits - so they aren’t costing taxpayers one extra red cent) is so that they have an extra year to earn the money they need.  Would you rather the various levels of government raise your taxes to reduce the cost of tuition?

Posted by Wayne Scott Ng on 11/17 at 01:10 PM

POSTED ON BEHALF OF DOUG LITTLE

You may remember Ontario has been up this alley before. John Snobelen tried to remove only one week from the summer holidays and guess who landed on his head? No not the teachers, cottage owners, the resort industry, the CNE, students with summer jobs, parents who travel or want more time with their kids.
I believe in more hours but the best way to do this is early childhood education (start earlier) longer days for students (which is not the same as longer days for teachers) Saturday classes for languages, summer programs for poor kids and low performers, evening booster programs like Pathways etc.
We can seriously increase hours in a highly targetted way. Year round programs have the same # of days as traditional school years. If you think teachers will work more days and longer hours for the same money, think again.

Posted by Malkin Dare on 11/17 at 04:42 PM

I think that if we got rid of some of the layered bureaucracy; gold-plated pensions, salaries and benefits; and staffed as the private sector does, then tuition would come down, and therefore there would be less worry about summer jobs.  There are a lot of tax dollars which are completely wasted.  All of the educrats’ greed has also created a class system, because many families can’t shoulder the expenses of a post secondary education.  If our money were spent as it should be, all schooling would be free.

Posted by Bev on 11/17 at 05:07 PM

Those places with year-round schooling (a good idea) need the community to support it.

Posted by John Myers on 11/17 at 05:31 PM

Agree with John that if the community is in support it should be tried.

It wouldn’t go over that well in my central Ontario tourist/farming district.

Posted by Chuck on 11/18 at 08:29 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Careers in the balance

Previous entry: SQE Latest Poll Question