Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

Why Johnny Doesn’t Understand What He Reads

May 18, 2015 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:21 AM

These days, there are all kinds of disorders available for kids who are struggling with reading - for example, auditory processing disorder, attention deficit disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, poor visual memory disorder, intermittent hearing loss, and now there's specific reading comprehension disability. 

A recent reading research study, however, suggests that the term is a misnomer. Although it is undoubtedly true that some children have severe comprehension problems, according to the study "the term specific reading comprehension disability is a misnomer: Individuals with problems in reading comprehension that are not attributable to poor word recognition have comprehension problems that are general to language comprehension rather than specific to reading."

The study recommends that children with reading comprehension problems should be given intensive phonics teaching, along with interventions that address deficits "in oral language like vocabulary, semantics, and syntactic understanding (i.e., grammar)".  H/T CT

Share this article

Comments

I have an MEd in reading and before retirement, I taught grades one through twelve and college level developmental courses.  In all those years, I worked with thousands of students.  The students with true disabilities could be counted on the fingers of one hand.  The others with reading problems had simply never been taught correctly.  If every child was given pure phonics instruction in first grade, 99.9% would be competent readers and most would know more about the English language than today’s classroom teachers. 

As cute as they were, the “Dick and Jane’ method of sight reading instruction led the way to today’s problems.  Interestingly, the publishers now warn that these books shouldn’t be used for reading instruction.  Unfortunately, attempts to move back to pure phonics are met with stiff, but misguided resistance.  Meanwhile, the children continue to suffer.

Posted by Gloria B. on 05/25 at 06:44 AM

Now I know why younger people are so ignorant of basic knowledge.

Stupid me, I thought it was the public education they were almost getting.

Posted by Ken on 05/25 at 09:07 AM

In thirty years, I have never seen or heard of the label Specific Reading Comprehension Disability.  Any fool knows that reading comprehension starts with language comprehension.  Maybe this article is American.

Ken, young people today know more than we did when we were their age.  It’s hard to believe that you think that the amazing flow of information hasn’t raised everyone’s general knowledge.  I think you like to fabricate things so you can grind on about something.

Posted by Christina on 05/25 at 01:04 PM

Gloria,
I have to disagree with you.  I taught reading in the classroom using sequential phonics and most students caught on quickly.  I have taught remedial reading for 15 years and the majority of my students do not catch on quickly.  Teaching these students to read is a much longer process requiring considerable patience. These students have exceptional difficulties with sound/symbol connections and they for sure have some sort of reading block or disability.  If you’ve ever tried to teach yourself to have perfect pitch you would know the challenges these students face.  if you can count on one hand the number of students you taught with reading disabilities then I can only conclude that the majority of your experience was not with Sp Ed students.

Posted by Christina on 05/25 at 09:23 PM

Only someone with their head in the sand would think that today’s youth have more knowledge than people educated in the 60’s and 70’s.

You only have to talk with them for 5 min. to find out how little they were taught in the public education system.

The ‘flow of information’ never got to them. Make sure you count the change they give you at the cash register.

Posted by Ken on 05/25 at 10:14 PM

Gloria,
I taught beginning reading in the classroom using sequential phonics and most children caught on quite quickly.  For 15 years I have been teaching remedial reading.  For the majority of my students, the process is long and arduous.  Teaching them requires considerable patience and empathy.  Chalking their reading difficulties up to poor teaching does little to promote our understanding of the very real challenges these children face each and every lesson.
Try teaching yourself to have perfect pitch (unless you already have it) and you will experience their challenges first-hand.

Posted by Christina on 05/25 at 10:37 PM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: