What about uniting on behalf of students?
In his comment to yesterday's blog, Doug paints a dismal picture of an us-against-them scenario, whereby it's a dog-eat-dog contest between teachers and management over money and the spoils go to the loudest and most determined antagonist. Doug implies that, without their unions, teachers would not be paid as well and there would be fewer jobs. In this scenario, teachers' union dues of more than $1,000 a year are well worth the benefits that their union wins on behalf of teachers.
Meanwhile, in Louisiana where the rate of teacher unionization is very low due to a combination of factors (right-to-work state and Hurricane Katrina), education spending, hiring, and compensation have exploded. more It's just barely possible that some education administrators are motivated to pursue policies that benefit students, as opposed to crucifying teachers, and that teachers would actually be better off without unions. H/T DW




Share this article