Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

The Trend Continues

January 18, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 04:31 PM

Looks as if this trend in teacher evaluation is spreading—and supported by the teachers’ unions!  From the state that brought us value-added assessment, Tennessee, is this report from the Tennessean, the Nashville newspaper, is summarized below:

Four years ago, Holston Middle was a school where hard-working teachers weren’t seeing results.  It was only a matter of time before the Knox County school ended up on the state’s target list, said Principal Tom Brown, and that would mean state sanctions and the stigma of being a failing school.

Frustrated, the teachers overwhelmingly voted to launch a new system that would revamp the school by offering bonuses for top teachers, offering loads of on-site training for staff and tying yearly evaluations to student test scores.

The TAP system — the new, formal name that used to be an acronym — worked, and now it’s one of several teacher evaluation models state leaders are pointing to as a way student test scores and performance pay can lead to better schools.

Lawmakers this week passed new legislation that would for the first time require student test scores to be included in a teacher’s evaluations. It also would require teachers to be evaluated annually.  Knoxville Superintendent of Schools James McIntyre said the district is eager to share its success story with the state and thinks components of the system could be adapted to a larger scale.

“This is a strong, successful instructional improvement and school reform model,” he said. “I’ve been talking to anyone who will listen about the success we’ve seen, and I would be very interested in expanding the model.”

The idea is controversial because opponents argue that teachers can’t control all the things that go into a good test score, like a good night’s sleep or a solid breakfast.

But supporters of the TAP system say it won approval from teachers’ unions, parents, and principals, because of its focus on training, rewarding good teachers and setting clear expectations.

Comments

I agree with the teachers, that they don’t have complete control over their environment—too many variables; however, who the does? 
Get used to it teachers!  It’s called life in the real world…

Posted by Bev Koski on 01/18 at 08:31 PM

The devil is in the details of these things. Obama calls it merit pay to pay more for teachers to simply accept assignments in difficult schools. The AFT says it is OK if the financial pay out is small and only one of many parts of the teacher’s assessment. They Brought in a merit pay system in Portugal and scores on the national exam fell significantly the next year. Larry Cuban has documented the history of merit pay over the years and it is a history of great fanfare, then a lot of argument around details and eventual abandonment. The employers are often not willing to offer enough money to actually encourage a teacher to work differently but even small amount ‘not awarded’ to a lot of teachers alienates them. They accuse the principal of favouritism, two factions form up in the school and nobody works together.

What do you do with the 60% of teachers who don’t teach the subjects that are being tested in high school or the 20% who do not in elementary school. Any school board that is seen to be punative towards teacher is quickly known by the teacher grape vine and no new teachers will locate there. You are asking for a big mess of problems. Wait and see. They are in the middle of it in Houston and find even the same teacher in the same grade level can not duplicte their results year over year due to the many variables.

Posted by Doug Little on 01/28 at 01:14 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: A Head Start on Insolvency

Previous entry: No Royal Road to Learning