Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

The Middle-School Cliff

March 12, 2012 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:07 AM

In Ontario, it has become quite common for school boards to segregate their grade 7 and 8 students in a separate school called a middle school. But when a Harvard professor decided to investigate the effectiveness of middle schools, his findings cast serious doubt on the wisdom of this practice.

Basically, the researchers found that "moving to a middle school causes a substantial drop in student test scores (relative to that of students in who remain in K-8 schools) the first year in which the transition takes place." As well, they found that "the relative achievement of middle-school students continues to decline in the subsequent years they spend in such schools", nor was there any evidence that these losses were ever recouped in high school. In fact, there was evidence that a higher percentage of middle-school students went on to drop out of school.

The researchers suggest two main (possibly inter-related) explanations: a) school transitions lower student achievement; and b) the overall climate for student learning is worse in middle schools. Here is a more nuanced discussion of the study's findings.

We find little evidence that the negative effects of attending a middle school are attributable to differences in resources, cohort sizes, or educational practices. We do, however, find suggestive evidence that the overall climate for student learning is worse in middle schools than in schools that serve students from elementary school through the 8th grade. This suggests a final potential interpretation of our results that is directly related to the choice of grade configuration: students may benefit from being among the oldest students in a school setting that includes very young students, perhaps because they have greater opportunity to take on leadership roles. This interpretation could account for both the gains in relative achievement made by students in K-5 and K-6 schools prior to entering middle schools and the superior performance of K-8 students relative to their peers in middle schools....

Taken as a whole, our results suggest that school transitions lower student achievement but that attending middle schools in particular has adverse consequences for American students. Especially when considered along with those of other recent studies, our findings clearly support ongoing efforts in urban school districts to convert stand-alone elementary and middle schools into schools with K-8 configurations.

Share this article

Comments

This is interesting because Catholic schools (at least as far as I know in Ontario) never went the middle school route for two practical reasons—children received their sacraments before high school and it was just plain cheaper not to have them in the days of partial funding.

Posted by doretta on 03/12 at 08:48 AM

Not once but twice in the last ten years our school division tried to impose the early school /middle school configuration into our urban schools.  Reconfigure, in my opinion, to suit archaic early school/ middle school pedagogy.  What this meant for parents and students was to completely displace the families and communities that support each school within these towns, and the ramifications of that, from a family and community perspective, were colossally unbeneficial.

Posted by Dhannie Trueman on 03/12 at 10:39 AM

I’d like to know how you base your assertion that, “In Ontario, it has become quite common for school boards to segregate their grade 7 and 8 students in a separate school called a middle school.”  In rural Ontario, schools are moving to the K-12 model. I’ve checked edugovonca, there are 4,931 schools in Ontario.  According to wikipedia (of all places), there are 97 middle schools.  That’s a grand total of just under 2%.  Now you are trying to assert that 2% is quite common?

Posted by Wayne Scott Ng on 03/12 at 11:08 AM

“In rural Ontario, schools are moving to the K-12 model.”

Not ALL rural schools board Wayne. Some maybe but just as many are moving to a 7-12 model.

Posted by Chuck on 03/12 at 03:21 PM

Actual, both Chuck and Wayne are correct. However, the middle school model is quite common in the urban settings, but than again one would not know that in the Canada’s provincial education systems, since the configuration of schools are not tracked.

A few links below on configuration research reports, based mostly on U.S. data. However the first one is of interest, at the end of the report a few Ontario boards with the configurations for 2009.

“Toronto District School Board
- currently has K-5, 6-8 and 9-12 schools
- looking at creating K-8 schools as they consolidate schools due to declining
enrolment “
http://blog.amdsb.ca/pdf/arc/bluewater-sh/_SchoolGradeConfigurationResearch.pdf

http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~edhuey/datastore/files/docs/Dhuey_MiddleSchool_July2011.pdf

http://www.hpedsb.on.ca/ec/directorsoffice/arc/documents/Configuringschools.pdf

http://www.tdsb.on.ca/wwwdocuments/about_us/external_research_application/docs/GradeSpanLitReview.pdf

Overall theme of the reports, is that the configuration of the school has no impact on achievement. I would argue that middle-school configuration is bad for achievement, but than again no one keeps track of the various achievement of schools with the various configurations as a routine practice. to make valid comparisons from a year to year basis. I can’t prove my side, nor can the school boards prove without a doubt, that a middle-school configuration is just as good as a 7 to 12 configuration or a K to 12 configuration.

Posted by Nancy on 03/12 at 05:04 PM

I have searched the Internet for hours looking for recent research that documents benefits from a separate middle school configuration. I can find none. Instead I find repeated articles such as this one. See the collection of articles at http://schoolarchiveproject.blogspot.com/2012/02/separate-middle-schools-vs-k-8.html

If anyone knows of recent research indicating a superiority of the middle school separation over the k-8 configuration, please let me know of it. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Posted by Bill Betzen on 03/22 at 10:34 AM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: