Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

The case of the disappearing money

September 26, 2015 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 06:56 AM

Back-to-school shopping has always included things like pencil cases and backpacks, but in BC schools are now asking parents to stock the school.  more   My brother in BC tells me he's expected to supply the school with "reams of photocopy paper, 6 large refill packages of wet wipes and 10 boxes of tissue, 10 white board markers and a ton of the other things". 

So the story line from BC schools is that they are underfunded. However, this recent Fraser Institute study shows that per-student funding in BC increased 41% in constant dollars over a recent ten-year period. Clearly, none of this additional money is reaching the classroom or maybe even the school. Instead of meekly accepting the party line about education cutbacks, BC teachers should start a serious money trail hunt.

The thing is - some parents can afford to underwrite their children's school, but for others it's a real financial burden. Public education was instituted for parents who couldn't afford to send their children to a private school. The wheel has turned full circle, and now some parents can't afford to send their children to a public school.

Share this article

Comments

Just like Detroit.  In their schools they were asking parents to buy light bulbs and other sundry items.  Some of the closed/abandoned schools has millions of dollars worth equipment that was never retrieved… 

I guess government/publically-funded institutions when they get too large and powerful is to take and take, but give next to nothing back to the payee.  I see no end in sight to this either.

Posted by Bev on 09/26 at 12:01 PM

the only part wrong in this story, is Rob Fleming’s rant about underfunding
in schools.  Actually, spending in schools has gone UP, exponentially, above and beyond the cost of inflation over the past decade
http://www.fraserinstitute.org/research-news/display.aspx?id=22222  .

Especially when declining enrolment deems that even more $$ are being spent on our kids than ever before.

What needs to be examined, however, is where
the money is going. I know for a fact that our school Administration spent thousands of dollars on an artist to come in and draw pretty illustrations at the school planning sessions last year, while our most excellent art teacher at our school, was not asked to perform the same task for free.  Staff meetings at the school include catered meals/food.  Every month.  These are just 2 examples I have witnessed, and although it is not meant to be picky, it certainly needs some discussion when parents are then asked to
contribute $10 PAC contributions for our school every year, and, as this parent in the interview has most eloquently pointed out, why should we be paying for the necessities of our kids’ learning?  Curious to know where our tax dollars are going.  Perhaps to help fund even more committees and conferences for School and
Ministry staff to go and discuss what our kids need these days. 

And don’t even get me started on all the crazy spending at the District level…

Posted by Tara Houle on 09/26 at 03:01 PM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: