Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Technology is going to transform the educational landscape

June 23, 2014 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:19 AM

GUEST BLOG BY TOM BEREND, SQE DIRECTOR

If you traveled back in time to just before the Internet caught on and tried to tell people about our new technologies, no one would believe you. After all, it's less than 25 years ago. Today, you can find out anything through your mobile phone ("Beam me up, Scotty?"). There's a free instantly-updated mega-encyclopedia built by citizens in their spare time (Wikipedia). There are major businesses without offices or employees. And the list goes on.

But Alvin Toffler's Future Shock is still with us. The past 25 years will be boring, boring, boring compared with the NEXT 25 years, as if almost nothing had happened! 

However, there is one exception - education. It has barely changed in the last 25 years. However, interesting things are starting to happen.

For example:  we recently heard from a mom who was in a 'school co-op'.  What is a co-op?  Maybe five moms who happened to meet in prenatal yoga and kept in touch, or who live on the same street. They decide that they are going to jointly home-school in their own little private school.

How can they afford to do this?  Easy to imagine that one of them commits full-time, and the other couples provide a parent one day a week. Or each couple commits someone one day per week, and maybe some of the grandparents want to help. In BC, and Alberta, they would be eligible for small government grants to help fund this, or about $25K per year. More than enough to cover renting a space, buying computers and books, and paying for some amazing field trips.

But that doesn't make a school. That's where the Internet comes in. The co-op has free or almost-free access to amazing curriculum resources - better than what the schools use. The kids will get the same attention as homeschooling, a 5-1 student-teacher ratio that no school can afford. They will have infinite libraries on their tablets, pen-pals around the world, and access to lectures from the best professors on the planet. Enough different adults that discipline and teaching momentum can be maintained.

This is all stuff we have NOW.  Now imagine some future technology - http://www.edutopia.org/blog/five-future-education-technologies-nick-grantham.

Ontario already has about 20,000 homeschoolers, with more every day - in part because technology is making it easier and more attractive. And frankly, declining public school performance is having the same effect. It's time for Ontario to follow Alberta's and BC's leads and support parents directly.

From the taxpayers' point of view, homeschooling saves thousands of dollars per child. And of course, the kids learn more. A win-win situation.

Share this article

Comments

Just some of the diversity in homeschooling co-ops and resources. .

1. Guide to the Best Homeschooling and Unschooling Resources - http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2014/06/guide-to-the-best-homeschooling-and-unschooling-resources/

2. http://www.homeschool-freesource.com/

3. How about i-Tunes University? http://www.apple.com/education/ipad/itunes-u/

An example of a homeschooling co-op. Has over 200 members. http://mtairyhomeschoolingcoop.org/

Worth exploring - just check out the courses being offered or had been offered in the past - http://mtairyhomeschoolingcoop.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Cumulative_MAHC_Classes.pdf

Posted by Nancy on 06/23 at 08:34 AM

We are in the process of investigations of skipe lessons to China but everybody needs to take a valium.

University of Phoenix has very few grads although it is all on line. Virtual ed public and private is having a terrible time finding traction because the students most attracted to it are low achieving couch potatoes. 

Our teachers show You tube quick short videos all the time. It is beautiful for 10 min shorts on ‘the water cycle’ as an example.

Replace the teacher?

So far film, film strips, radio, educational TV, computers, the internet all were going to totally replace the teacher 1920 to 2014.

So far each has become an instructional tool in the hands of teachers

BTW did you see the Ipsos Reid poll in BC that said 15% believe teachers are overpaid?

CD Howe recently concluded that paying teachers more clearly improves results. Canada and USA were examples. Canada pays more and gets better results. 5 American states pay more than Canada and top American results. Alberta pays the mist in Canada best results.

Posted by Doug Little on 06/23 at 10:22 AM

(Ontario already has about 20,000 homeschoolers)And not only that there will be a lot less politicization of young, impressionable minds by the usual suspects associated with the teacher unions.For once we can be thankful that social justice and the rest of the education orthodoxy will be buried for good.

Posted by @edubeat on 06/23 at 10:27 AM

As usual Doug, is way behind when it comes to technology. Par for the course, when it comes to the K to 12 education establishment and their resistance to technology. The topic is on 21st century technology, and not the disappearance of teachers Doug. Classroom teachers are force to use the enclosed programs set up by the IT departments of school boards or education ministries. Not when it comes to apps like i-Tunes University or Chrome’s growing education apps such as Spell Up game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICm0at4N2OM

In the K to 12 schools, Spell Up would not be approved, If there is one thing I do know, the public K to 12 education system uses technology in ways that are not beneficial to students’ learning. Often rules/regulations and union contracts often prevent the new apps, software and new ways of using technology to benefit students’ learning. In one area alone, the K to 12 schools (really is the K to 12 establishment) are so determined to keep audio e-books, e-readers out of the hands of the struggling readers. When there is e-readers and audio e-books on hand, often the features are disconnected that renders the e-reader a useless tool for struggling readers. All made that much more difficult, when the K to 12 system will not supply the resources of e-books across the span of subject areas. Just to access the e-books, is a time consuming effort on the student, the teacher and the principal. The paperwork is unreal just to get permission to have access to the e-book material, and once access is given there is very little choice at all in the offerings.

The K to 12 education establishment treats the 21st century technology in trying to force the technology to work best only for the teachers, while restricting the technology to the students.

Posted by Nancy on 06/23 at 12:37 PM

Well said Nancy, you are absolutely correct.  I know this post is on technology, but in keeping with your comments, it is also impossible to get by those school board consultants who like to sell their own products vs. those that might actually help students.  Our kids are at the whim of District staff and their cronies when it comes to resources.  I realize that this is a “public system”, and that we cannot ask for the very best of the best when it comes to resources, but at the same time, it is maddening to see all this money wasted on inefficient textbooks and programs which big marketing companies are pushing on schoolboards and education ministries.

Here in BC the idea of homeschool co-ops sounds very appealing given our current fiasco with the BCTF and our government.  Private school enrollment has been shown to increase dramatically with each job action the BCTF takes.  This is fine for some families, but out of reach for most of us.  However these co-ops are a viable option.  I will be curious to see if these co-ops will also start increasing as parents’ frustration has passed the boiling point and more of us are starting to get proactive despite what the mucky muks in charge want us to believe.

Posted by Tara on 06/23 at 07:43 PM

It seems that perhaps Mr. Doug is firmly entrenched in a world perspective similar to the leadership of China today. In China, we have Tienanmen Square being systematically eliminated from public memory.  In Hong Kong, we have another current example of a strong aversion of the powers that be for anything not invented in Beijing.

As in Hong Kong yesterday and for the next few days, if the masses can’t be convinced that they should bow to Beijing, then they shall be blanketed by mass denials of service to insure that they cannot express even their unofficial opinions online.  http://www.adn.com/2014/06/23/3530259/hong-kong-activists-push-democracy.html

Despite this unprecedented technical assault, the locals are turning out in huge numbers to physically line up to register their viewpoints in an unofficial poll. 

Perhaps Doug has been working for Big Brother too long to realize there could be an alternate reality which apparently by default has been erased from his memory.

One of the unintended consequences of the current structure of education is that the clients have pretty well been relegated to being firewood for the system operators.  Without the fuel of clients, what is the point of the system…and so it goes on…or perhaps not if co-ops took fire as an app and went viral…now that could never happen could it…let’s see Facebook is how old ?

Posted by Frank Xavier on 06/23 at 08:53 PM

The one thing that really bugs me the most, are the IT departments of the school boards and education ministries. It is the quality of the products that are in question. For the most part very user unfriendly, and a hex to any of the software programs operating for the SE students. I really do think that the K to 12 education establishment think the SE students can’t handle anything complicated. Oh my, watch what happens if the SE student wants something that will challenge them or improved the dictionary feature that goes beyond primary vocabulary. My youngest child got a program to help with her writing. After ten minutes, she told me it was crap, and after an hour of frustration, I agreed with her. To no avail, I could not get the education officials to change the software.

My youngest had to wait until she entered university, to get all the equipment and software that would aid her to overcome her reading and writing difficulties. I never thought my youngest would be in the same position as the American LD students where parents were warning other parents the steep learning curve to use software that does a very effective job and this was in 2007. In 2014, my youngest carries the i-pad Air. It does everything for her, including making phone calls. According to my youngest it is the best tool she has when walking into lectures. https://www.apple.com/ipad-air/features/

The technology alone, have the potential to shape students’ education on individual pathways. I always used the technology that I purchased for my youngest based on how it could be used for improvement and achievement in her studies. I feel like a dinosaur, when I purchased a touch screen wireless desktop computer when she was in grade 11. So she would have a computer to take with her when she went to university. The last time she was down, she said to me, ‘Don’t worry Mom, the touch screen is used all the time. It is my work computer.” She said it to make feel better , because the touch screen is so out of date compared to what is available in 2014. However my youngest still uses the free open-source software that I found over the years to aid her in her writing. No thanks to the K to 12 education system, who kept banning the technology in the earlier years, and by grade 11, it was the opposite anything goes, as long as the school board or school did not have to pay for it.

Posted by Nancy on 06/23 at 11:21 PM

FRANK aren’t you a little off topic?

EDUBEAT I am happy to have anyone homeschool. They tend to be malcontents until they go. BTW the ones I know 50% are lefty granola types. I am sure they are teaching their kids how bad the tar sands are.

Posted by Doug Little on 06/24 at 07:04 AM

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: