Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

Politics 101

April 05, 2016 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:05 AM

Relevant to our discussion about child abuse and two solitudes when it comes to math instruction, the Ontario government has just expressed concern about the province's declining math scores and promised to spend an additional $60 million to address the problem. Unfortunately, not one dollar of the $60 million is to go towards the one measure most likely to be effective - namely, a switch to research-based methods and materials. Instead, the money will be spent on the following initiatives (commentary is mine).

A minimum of 60 minutes each day of protected learning time for effective mathematics instruction and assessment for students in Grades 1 to 8 (a hamster spends hours every day running his wheel, yet gets nowhere)

Up to three math lead teachers in all elementary schools (there could be 100 math lead teachers in every school, but if none of them knows or cares about research-based methods and materials, nothing will change)

Coaching for principals of select secondary schools to lead improvement in math among their students (if, as seems probable, the coaches don't know or care about research-based methods and materials, nothing will change)

Support for learning at home through parent resources that provide helpful tips and information on the mathematics curriculum (sure, offload the responsibility on to the parents some more)

Better access to online math resources and math supports such as Homework Help or SOS Devoirs (or, better still, offload the responsibility on to the students)

Math support for Grades 6 to 9 outside of the school day (you know what I'm going to say - non-research-based math support could be even worse than no support)

Opportunities for educators to deepen their knowledge in math learning, teaching and leading, including a dedicated math Professional Development Day to further their school improvement efforts (if these "opportunities" were to actually support teachers' quest for better knowledge of math, this would be helpful - but that's a huge if)

The bottom line is - this is Politics 101. Once again, the Ontario government is reacting to a problem with lots of spending and activity that won't accomplish anything but looks good to the voters. 

Share this article

Comments

Didn’t Liz, (our minister of ed) work as a professor of computer science or something similar?
Judging from her age, she got drill, and repetition in math basics, which she should be thankful for since she would have needed some university math in order to go into the technical stream. 

But of course politics trumps integrity, so she’ll allow this inefficient, math curriculum in Ontario to continue to be in classrooms, despite the fact that it causes many children to fail at math.

During recent contract negotiations, our minister of ed also allowed another pd day to be given to elementary teachers; yet seems to think that more time needs to be dedicated to math in the classroom.  So,  according to Liz:  less time in the classroom because of yet another pd day, but more time ‘discovering’ math in the classroom.  Go figure…

Posted by Bev on 04/05 at 10:51 AM

Exactly Malkin.

So back in the day, when math was actually being taught properly (and enough of you naysayers saying no it wasn’t. No it wasn’t.  We have enough data and evidence to suggest math instruction was MUCH better than it is TODAY.  Look it up!), the amount of instructional time was LESS than it is today.  I guess building “projects” in math class takes up more time than reviewing times tables. This is akin to telling someone to eat more junk food rather than a smaller, well portioned healthy meal. 

And this line in the report really says it all: 

“The renewed math strategy is informed by research and lessons learned from the education sector.”

Okay well, the research from the education sector is what’s gotten us into trouble in the first place because they HAVE no empirical data they rely on.  And the education consultant and ed professors which carry out their messages, are THE REASON behind poor math skills today. 

This is a terrific blog entry by Greg Ashman. 

The comments at the bottom of this article are rather telling as well:

https://gregashman.wordpress.com/2016/03/25/ed-schools-versus-consultants/

This is nothing more than a way to appease taxpayers that the government is doing something to appease the math crisis in Ontario. 

What a complete waste of money.

Posted by Tara Houle on 04/05 at 11:16 AM

The Ministry has posted their guide “Doing Mathematics with Your Child” in English and 13 other languages.  https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/parentGuideNum.html

Hard for me to judge, but I think this thin guide is about worthless.  Parents who are already engaged in teaching their child will find it superficial, and the rest won’t get through the self-congratulatory introductions.  There are no drills or worksheets or anything that looks like foundation skills.

Ontario’s dropping math (and literacy) scores have a direct causal link to life-long under-employment and marginalization.  It’s too late to help the older kids still counting on their fingers.  But never too late for a happy press release attached to another bucket of money.

Posted by Tom on 04/05 at 12:11 PM

Just a reiteration of what Malkin has already said, but I also like the way Robyn said it

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/robyn-urback-ontario

Posted by Tara Houle on 04/05 at 10:44 PM

I looked at the education ministry’s website.  Granted, it was good of them to publish it in 13 languages, but I was angered when it stated that the more parents help their children, the better they will do in math…

Hello? 
What about the parents who don’t understand math?  What about parents who are so darned tired after putting in an eight hour day at work, and have to come home, cook supper, clean, do laundry, and then tutor their kids in math? 
And what about the parents who may not be interested in their children’s struggles with math?

Our education system is for all children; not the ones whose parents can afford tutoring or happen to have the time, energy, patience and knowledge to work with their children.  As a taxpayer, I want all children to have a chance, so why does the ministry tell us that we’re largely responsible for the education of our children?

For years, I was stuck teaching my daughter math, because of negligence at the school, but I was fortunate enough to only be working part-time.

When my husband and I were in school, neither of us needed a single evening of math tutoring from our parents.  Back in our day, the teachers had a good math syllabus, and they worked hard.  Because I was fortunate enough to have been well-taught, math was always a breeze, so consequently I always got in the high 90’s—right from grade one to graduation.

My husband like many others from working poor families (I know of many) got an excellent education.  He went on to be a chemist—the sciences are the toughest courses at the university level.  His parents (whom I had a great deal of respect for) had neither the language skills nor the ability in the maths to have helped him.  He relied totally on the educational system. 

Today, our educational system is not doing its job, and they want to pass what is their responsibility onto parents.  This is not what we’re paying for. 

Quit unloading your work onto the parents! 

Posted by Bev on 04/06 at 09:37 AM

Two years ago, Minister Sandals announced millions for math training for teachers. Paid off didn’t it?  Another concern is that there is NO accountability for how this money is spent.  Will the teachers’ unions do inservicing? Waste of money by all accounts.

Posted by Doretta on 04/06 at 10:36 AM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: