Parents as Partners? Really?
What has been your experience with school councils? SFT wants to know.
I thought I would pick up on yesterday’s topic. They might be called by different names across the country, but essentially school and parent councils were supposed to be a way for parents to hold their local schools accountable for the children’s education.
A year ago, I sat on a panel that was asked to discuss these questions:
Do parents have the right expertise to be partners? Or should we be thinking of parents’ role differently? Some want parents to have more power; some want them to have less - why? What would be the most effective way for them to participate in their schools and the education of their children? What, if any, role should parents play in areas like curriculum?
(This is real parent power that I blogged about here.)
We’d like to know your thoughts on your own experiences and what can be done to improve how they work, if at all. Would you keep them advisory? Would you abolish school boards and let each council govern their own schools? Would you get rid of councils and replace them with something altogether different? Or, would you just give parents real school choice options?
So readers, what would your recommendations be if you could write a report?




Parent councils have failed. I sat on one, and the parents were more concerned about getting on with the principal (who had a different agenda) than getting anything done. It made me realize that this is why boards of ed are ineffectual as well—just human nature.
My experience while living in Asia, where parents had school choice, is that parents will silently vote with their feet if they’re unhappy with a school, so the schools in turn were fiercely competitive, and knew to provide a strongly academic, happy environment. It was great for the children—they thrived.