Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Not in Ontario - Pity!

June 11, 2013 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 05:13 AM

In a response to Ontario's glut of certified teachers, the government has decided to address the problem by doubling the length of pre-service training from one year to two. more. 

Yet Ontario's teacher training is basically a waste of time - when the Ontario College of Teachers surveyed the province's teachers about the source of their teaching skills, courses at a faculty of education ranked dead last - well below common sense and lessons from their families (see Table 4.1). Given the lack of effectiveness of Ontario pre-service teacher certification programs, it doesn't make sense to double the amount of time students have to put in. 

There's a fascinating article in the latest Education Next that talks about the possibility of improved (and less expensive) teacher pre-service training that online learning is beginning to deliver in the US. One example is USC's Rossier School of Education partnership with online learning company 2U. It's really worth reading what's going on here, what with interactive, web-based lectures with classes of 15 students, along with an in-person practicum component of 20 weeks in the students' local school districts. "Student teachers have an on-site supervisor and are also armed with video cameras, which allow them to record and upload their lessons to USC faculty, peers, and others for feedback".

Not only are the new online courses less expensive and more convenient, they also appear to be BETTER, In addition, they have the advantage of allowing candidates to allow their students to complete the program while continuing to hold down a job - meaning that "they will make becoming a teacher possible for a broader population of candidates, which lends hope that the country's education system can attract more talent and make the profession more competitive. The future is a teacher education industry that is both of higher quality and lower cost."

Share this article

Comments

But don’t these teacher graduates who are better prepared through online courses, as opposed to getting a two-yr OTC, still have to be hired by the boards?  Are the boards interested in superior training or will they simply accept what the ‘blob’ tells them which will be that the candidate with an OTC is more highly qualified.  Also, once they’re in this lousy system—with bad curricula and horrible to non-existent teaching method—what can they possibly do to get children in their charge to learn any better?

Posted by Bev on 06/11 at 02:13 PM

POSTED ON BEHALF OF DOUG

Civil rights hero James Meredith has serious question for reform movement regarding testing, vouchers, charters, and teacher evaluation.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/06/12/james-meredith-asks-21-tough-questions-about-school-reform/

Posted by Malkin Dare on 06/12 at 09:49 AM

This elegantly validates part of Peter Schiff’s argument in last week’s ‘Sunday Movie’ - that innovation can deliver dramatic improvements in both cost and outcomes. 

Both institutions are private but it is certain that their innovations will ripple into the public universities.

If you haven’t seen Schiff’s clip, it’s worth a few minutes. /index.php/blog/read/sunday-at-the-movies-getting-government-out-of-education

Posted by Tom on 06/13 at 03:50 AM

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: