Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Math Class Shouldn’t Be Tough

December 07, 2011 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 06:38 AM

In light of the tremendous response to the WISE Math initiative in western Canada, I thought you might find this article of interest. Although it is talking about the US, and the first 12 paragraphs may or may not apply to us in Canada, the rest of the article deals with a phenomenon which is all too similar here. This phenomenon is the under-enrollment of students in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) subjects. 

The point is - we're graduating way too many liberal arts students and not nearly enough STEM students. With the growth of the high-tech sector and technological developments in general, more and more jobs require technical skills. And, not only is this where the jobs are, but also the STEM jobs pay a lot more. You would think there would be a stampede of applicants for the STEM subjects. But there isn't.

There are undoubtedly multiple factors at work here, including unenlightened counselling on the part of parents and high school guidance teachers, but there is no doubt that students are unlikely to go into astrophysics if they struggled with math in school. Yet virtually all students can learn math to a high standard - if taught properly. H/T to JE

Share this article

Comments

” Yet virtually all students can learn math to a high standard - if taught properly.”

So very true, but not according to the educrats and others within the education system, WISE, certainly confirms all of my concerns, reading the new comments of people joining WISE. Even a few comments, of students getting zero for getting the right answer, but using the wrong methods of the old efficient ones. Or stories on how the educrats with their teachers’ certificate behind them, telling parents how the new methods are so much better for students. Really, using the most inefficient methods, taxing the memory processes, and less apt for learning and understanding are better for students, leads only to one outcome.

The one outcome, not enough STEM students, and not enough students with the require math knowledge to entered into the skill trades.  Another problem, is what I have recently discovered, is the high school science textbooks, and in particular science with math. Physics where math, calculus goes hand in hand with the fundamental laws and knowledge of physics. . The physics textbook is a carbon copy of the current math textbooks, and reminds of the lousy math make sense series, without the fundamental basics to make the connections to the mountain of poorly written math problems.

No one has to wonder why, some and if not most students, by grade 11 physics or chemistry will decide than and there, STEM fields will not be in their future. Textbooks written by educators with questionable background knowledge in the STEM field,

Posted by Nancy on 12/07 at 10:12 AM

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: