Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

Keeping Students Safe

September 19, 2013 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 06:49 AM

The doctors' credo "first do no harm" should apply to schools as well, yet sometimes children are harmed in schools - by poor teaching techniques that blight their lives, by bullying, by environmental factors like mould or loud noise, by teachers who are sexual predators, and the list goes on. Well, now - at long last - the Ontario government has taken steps to reduce the harm done by teachers who are sexual predators. Click here for the relevant press release. 

You may be surprised that some of these measures are not already in place - for example, automatic revocation of the certificates of convicted sexual predators? Resolve cases quickly? Telling school boards about teachers who may be threats to students? These things should have been implemented long ago.

But the biggie is this one - "Avoiding potential conflicts of interest by preventing union or association representatives from sitting on the college's council, where college policy is developed and approved". If it means what I think it means, namely keeping union reps off the Ontario Council of Teachers, this is huge. It was the main recommendation SQE made to former Justice Patrick LeSage in the course of his investigation into the College's investigation and discipline practices. 

I anticipate that the teachers' unions will fight this measure tooth and nail since it appears to threaten their control of the College. If they don't fight it, then it must mean there's a work around available. Or else I'm missing something.

Share this article

Comments

POBOD

The college of teachers is not an arm of gov’t on which teachers are allowed to participate, it is an arm of the teachers’ movement.

It is totally paid for by the teachers. NOBODY should even be on it unless they pay fees.

Posted by Malkin Dare on 09/19 at 11:58 AM

I took the time out to count the number of elected members on the OCT council who are educators that have close ties to the union and its executive. I counted 17 out of 23 elected members. Of course the Discipline Committee is top heavy with members having closed ties to the respective teachers’ unions in Ontario.

The OCT is not an arm of government?? 

The legislative acts - http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_96o12_e.htm

The history of the college - http://www.oct.ca/about-the-college/what-we-do/college-history

What the OCT does - http://www.oct.ca/about-the-college/what-we-do

Self-regulation - “Self regulation recognizes the maturity of a profession. It honours the special skills, knowledge and experience that a profession possesses.

Self-regulation means that the government has delegated its regulatory functions to those who have the specialized knowledge necessary to do the job. The granting of self-regulation acknowledges a profession’s members are capable of governing themselves.”
http://www.oct.ca/about-the-college/what-we-do/professional-self-regulation

It sure looks like the Ontario government is the top dog in - “Ontario is introducing legislation to protect students by making the disciplinary process for the province’s teachers more clear and transparent. ”  Last time I check, the only legal body that can enact laws are the duly elective governments of the day.

“Ontario is introducing legislation to protect students by making the disciplinary process for the province’s teachers more clear and transparent. “

Sure the teachers’ union will fight tooth and nail on this one. Especially on this one - “Avoiding potential conflicts of interest by preventing union or association representatives from sitting on the college’s council, where college policy is developed and approved”

In the National Post - http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/19/ontario-bill-would-automatically-revoke-licences-of-teachers-convicted-of-sexual-abuse-child-porn-charges/

Soon the regulation regime - the long arm of government will be paying a visit to the OCT. It won’t matter if the committees are loaded with members who are active in their unions. All the members will be presented with rule books designed and created by both the government and the OCT without the members input who are representatives of the union or sit on union committees.  It will limit the conflict of interests and private agendas in the OCT committees but the bonus will be, it will be a truer reflection of self-regulation. Isn’t self-regulation one of the goals of the teachers’ unions to act as a professional body?

Posted by Nancy on 09/19 at 02:55 PM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: