Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

It’s the Textbooks, Stupid

January 04, 2016 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 11:41 AM

Janice Vian writes in a comment to It's the Pre-Service Training, Stupid that what teachers really need in order to be more effective is good textbooks. I could not agree more (except, of course, to stipulate that teachers need some training on how to USE good textbooks to best advantage).

I would write reams in support of this revolutionary concept except that I already have. See here, for example.

Just to rant for a minute on my favourite topic - teaching beginning reading - the fact that no decodable readers are approved for use in Ontario means that it is almost impossible for grade 1 teachers to teach all their students to be good readers (thereby launching them into the good life). Good teaching materials are incredibly important, and the fact that Ontario's education leaders don't appear to realize this is almost beyond belief.

Share this article

Comments

A Blight Has Settled On Our Schools

There is a long history here and most people, especially parents, have no idea what has happened or continues to happen still.

If you’re a farmer you know the damage done by blight.  It sneaks in, attacks your crop, but doesn’t kill immediately.  Over the years, the disease has embedded itself into the very seeds so that gradually the whole farm crops are destroyed from within.

This is akin to what’s happened in education.  Educators — for various reasons, some for dubious pedagogic reasons, others for teacher-empowerment reasons — have subscribed to methods which were untested but had strong beliefs attached. 

Mindsets became engrained.  Constructivism is a global label for the predominant movement featuring — relativism, subjectivism, learning-by-doing, no textbooks, discovery, inquiry, child-centered, etc. approaches — excluding or disparaging standardized testing, direct instruction by teachers and evidence-based programs. 

It is this nose-thumbing of evidence-based research that is most troubling today.  Eric Kalenze in his popular education reform book — Education is Upside-Down, 2014 — says educators continue to “turn their noses up at research around building effective readers”. 

To get caught-up to the Reading-Wars and the mindset battles that continue to this day, read this 4 year old article — A is for Apple, B is for Brawl —

http://nymag.com/news/features/16775/index3.html

 

Posted by Tunya Audain on 01/04 at 03:13 PM

I agree,it must be a relationship in Ontario(Canada) between the large publishers,basals,and the Ministry.

Nothing else makes any sense.
With the internet,we can read about the research all day long.
What I notice is even with gold standard randomized trial research they dispute relevance and go on their merry way.
That`s just unconscionable!

Posted by Jo-Anne Gross on 01/05 at 09:59 AM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: