Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Instructional Techniques to Help Novices by Changing Cognitive Load Impositions

June 19, 2014 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 04:25 AM

I gather that this series of posts on cognitive load is been perceived as too wonky, judging by the lack of comments, and this is the last one in the series. But I just want to point out that the vampire of child-centred learning is still very much undead, and it's critically important to keep waving the garlic at it.

"To help a novice focus and learn it is essential to constrain the level of information that needs to be processed through working memory. This idea becomes one of the basic notions underpinning applications of load theory. Novices need to concentrate as deeply as they can on specific ideas without encumbrance from other sources....

"The finding that pre-instructional experience is valluable for novices is an important finding. That is why 'flip teaching' can be successful, where students are exposed to the big ideas, the vocabulary, and worked examples such that they can begin to form a higher order idea of the things they will need to learn - prior to learning actual details and more specific information needed for mastery. For example, students may watch a video from the Khan academy, see how something works, listen to the whole piece of music, read a chapter in the text book, play around with the tools, and so on, before going into more specific aspects....

"Among the findings that have emerged repeatedly in the cognitive load research is that problem solving is unlikely to be an effective method to employ if you are attempting to teach a knowledge schema. You need to know the ideas well before you start to relate them or use them in a problem solving situation. Problem solving activities impose heavy load and can become a source of interference....The cognitive load theory research has fixed upon the value of worked examples in a number of different fields as one effective and easy-to-apply means of providing necessary guidance to beginners....Worked examples provide a form of modelling through demonstrations of successful procedures or products....Those students asked to consolidate their learning through studying worked examples or completing partially worked examples, are more successful on later tests than students who spent the same amount of time working on unguided problem-solving activities . These effects are especially strong for novices, but as skill level increases and deep knowledge is acquired, worked examples become far less effective as they become unnecessary....

"A recent study...suggests that problem solving may become an effective teaching tool when capable students work together in well-motivated collaborative groups, rather than individually....The explanation for this lies in the possibilitiy that when a small group is working efficiently, its members are able to contain cognitive load through sharing the working memory functions across group members....

"It has been established through a steady stream of cognitive load theory studies that aids to learning will include (a) many signals or cues as to what to pay attention to, (b) a careful depiction and selection of the crucial words that are being used, and (c) any provisions that can reduce dependence upon memory during the initial acquisition process (e.g., such as not having to hold different sources of information in the working memory for longer than a few seconds."

The bottom line is that teachers can improve student learning dramatically by applying the principles of learning described in the cognitive load research literature, but of course teachers who have never heard of it are groping in the dark (as are their students, unfortunately).

Here resteth the gospel of St. John.

Share this article

Comments

Au contraire, this topic is one of the most interesting which has been opened up to this level. In lieu of setting aside, I suggest considering the development of a separate blog line exploring the development/or review of applications founded upon the principles of cognitive load principles.  Such applications might be applied by folks home schooling and provide “the pros” with a useful primer on a subject which they might not have been introduced to ...yet.

Cognitive loading is the realm where the rubber hits the road in the learning process.  The fact that it has hardly any foundational place in the existing “institutional schooling” systems speaks loudly to the world is flat theory of learning.

Posted by Frank Xavier on 06/19 at 06:37 AM

I’ve found that ‘flip-teaching’ as you call it is essential in my learning. I’m not a teacher but a learner and have found time and again that I can really ONLY learn well having first digested the layout of the land. Without having that overall conceptual view of the subject I find if difficult to piece together the details. My mind is in a constant state of panic until the wider picture has been taken in.
The exercise of piecing together a jigsaw puzzle is somewhat analogous to this process in learning. If all you have is a box of pieces without the final picture it’s going to take a lot longer to piece it together.
I wish someone had tought me these types of things while I was trying to learn at school.

Posted by William on 06/19 at 06:46 AM

Hi Malkin,

Actually your latest posts on cognitive learning is quite timely, as this topic seems to be in many newspapers, magazines and news articles lately.  Especially with our math initiative raging, it seems many leading researchers are coming to the forefront to show how kids quickly become overwhelmed with the multiple strategies they are forced to use in schools, and why it is so very important to ensure daily practice and repetition are utilized for automaticity of math facts.

Two of the more straightforward articles/video clips are here:

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-27297914

and here: 

https://www.facebook.com/notes/bring-back-column-addition-to-nzs-early-primary-maths-curriculum/automaticity-and-why-its-important-to-learn-your-times-tables/695832527126478

Even though this type of research is readily available, and has been around for some time, it is discouraging that education establishments continue to ignore this type of valid research when they are training new teachers.  Even more so, that when these teachers are on the job, that this research is never discussed on professional development days or school conferences.  Shocking.  It seems the “establishment” is more concerned about following their own pet agendas, rather than listening to sound research. 

That is why we are so grateful to the good folks here at SQE and other organizations, which continue to point out truths in the madness which has enveloped our education system.

Posted by Tara on 06/19 at 08:37 AM

“I just want to point out that the vampire of child-centred learning is still very much undead, and it’s critically important to keep waving the garlic at it.” So very true since I undertook a mini-search as the reasons why we must continue to keep waving the garlic at child-centered learning. First, the majority of research on cognitive load theory is taking place outside of the K to 12 educator research facilities. Second, the research that is taking place in the K to 12 research towers is mainly confined in acquiring a second language, motivation of students to behavioural theories. Third, the research falling outside of the K to 12, covers across the span of society, and includes business organizations. Keep it Sesame Street simple or To Keep it Simple to Reduce Cognitive Load -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xm9_g699fg

Posted by Nancy on 06/19 at 01:19 PM

Some of the cognitive load theory research taking place just within the parameters of the K to 12 is in instructional design. “So the trick for trainers and instructional designers: providing instruction in such a way that learning in working memory can be moved to long-term memory where it will, we hope, be called upon as needed, possibly in a not-very-conscious way.”  http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/498/nuts-and-bolts-brain-bandwidth—-cognitive-load-theory-and-instructional-design

And here - http://www.education.com/reference/article/cognitive-load-theory/

A 2003 paper on instructional design where John Sweller is one of the co-authors - http://cis.msjc.edu/evoc/637/References/Pass-CognitiveLoadTheoryAndID.pdf

A presentation from the Canada Research Chair of Special Education and Psychiatry called, ADHD: Going beyond behaviour – unto curriculum connections -  http://www.sadd.nl/wallpapers canada/RosemaryTannock.pdf

Criticism by the K to 12 education establishment on cognitive laod theory centers around the theme questioning the actual science, data and the conclusions that the teaching and instructional practices must change. The K to 12 educationalists don’t like science telling them their precious pedagogy theories are harming children and their education. A blog posting in Webs of Substances, the comments from the educators and a few professors that will show the push back from the educators.
http://websofsubstance.wordpress.com/2014/04/18/issues-with-cognitive-load-theory/

Posted by Nancy on 06/19 at 01:21 PM

Cognitive load theory is just a mere footnote in the current practices of the K to 12 education establishment. One would expect cognitive load theory to be in the areas of instructional practices for LD students or even the ADHD students due to the working memory problems of these students but it is addressed only as a footnote. At the OISE, cognitive load theory is certainly studied and taught to the new teacher trainees but often it is wrapped within the child-centered theories. Such as the Knowledge Building theory of the OISE professors, Scardamalia & Bereiter - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_building

I just know as a parent, I ended up reteaching many of a lesson due to child-centered instructional practices. On those days, I often wonder why was I sending my child to school, if she was not learning anything in the classroom? Her learning depended on my ability as a parent to break down the constructivist and discovery learning lessons to lessons where she could learn. Another paper describing the history of constructivism – Constructivism,in,Practical,and,Historical,Context - http://carbon.ucdenver.edu/~bwilson/Constructivism.pdf

Posted by Nancy on 06/19 at 01:23 PM

I’m afraid teachers are impatient souls, and even those who believe in direct instruction are wont to ignore the need for over-learning of basic knowledge and concepts.  Our Sound Foundations basic literacy materials are designed to bypass primary teachers’ notorious aversion to ‘drill’ by giving classroom assistants & parents a ready-made sequence of instruction which systematically builds skills and has enough periodic reinforcement to ensure automaticity of response. 

We got the idea from SRA (Distar), but we found that their materials moved too fast for SEN pupils.  The working memory problem is almost certainly a core component of ADHD and other ‘special needs’.  As Rosemary Tannock suggests, these are cognitive problems and not behavioural issues.

Posted by Tom Burkard on 06/23 at 08:42 AM

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: