Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Dateline: Boston, MA

October 25, 2009 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:07 AM

In 2004, the Arlington school board trustees decided they needed a change agent to transform the local school system into a high-achieving one. Accordingly, they hired Nate Levinson, a non-educator with a Harvard MBA and a decade of successful experience running a multimillion-dollar company, Levinson proved to be very effective in raising student achievement and balancing the budget, but he met his match when he tried to fire the principal of a problem school. An ugly sex scandal involving leaked e-mails erupted and, in the end, Levinson walked away from the job. The lesson here is that even the most talented and competent administrator can find it next to impossible to run a school board well and, since such individuals are in short supply anyway, perhaps we should consider radical changes to school administrative structures so that mere mortals have a chance of succeeding at the job.

In Massachusetts, 10,000 students drop out of school every year, many of them due to pregnancy or parenthood. Programs that make it possible for these teens to stay in school, as well as teen pregnancy prevention programs, are expected to be cut next year - since the state’s finances are in a mess. No consideration is apparently being given to finding ways of providing all elementary students with the strong academic foundation that is by far the best contraceptive. Sound familiar?

Comments

Yes, very familiar, and I agree that accademic achievement gives children a chance to dream of a future; otherwise they must feel hopeless.
Schools appear to look for any excuse not to teach the curricula.
As far as the Arlington Board losing a good, talented man, too bad, but when are they going to realize that if they’re not going to educate the kids, that they in turn will get discouraged and leave.
The decline of our civilization…

Posted by Bev Koski on 10/25 at 01:58 PM

In Amherst Mass. over this past week a newly established Chinese Charter School is accepting students for next year, AND, the Parent Committee(same as our School Council) meetings are televised locally. The topic of discussion when I tuned in was…...standardized testing pros and cons. - Imagine that….actual education issues being discussed and not fundraising.

Posted by Cathy on 10/30 at 12:27 PM

It would be interesting to see what they say are the cons of standardized testing—every dicipline that I know of tests in order to make sure that graduates know their material.  Would you trust a doctor or engineer who had never written a test?

Posted by Bev Koski on 10/30 at 12:56 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Time Out For Tenure?

Previous entry: Dateline: Albany, NY