Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Dateline: Albany, NY

October 23, 2009 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 05:41 AM

For months, the Bethlehem school district has been considering allowing cell towers on some of its schools as a way of generating additional revenue. Yesterday, however, parental outcry forced the district to abandon the notion. The Bethlehem school district currently spends just over $14,000 US per pupil.

The president of one of the teachers' unions expressed his opposition to evaluating teachers on the basis of their students' test scores. Not stated, but understood, is his union's implacable opposition to the dismissal of incompetent teachers. Yet "the difference between a good teacher and a bad teacher can be a full level of achievement in a single school year", according to Eric Hanushek, as quoted on page 3 of "Good Teaching Matters".

Share this article

Comments

Meanwhile here in Halton Erindale SS principal is under fire this hour as her school community came up with a relevant prize for teenagers showing excellent character development AND has over a 60% average.

The prize is for a new Camaro donated by a local dealer.

According to the Principal the board is ok with it, as are the school council who helped decide on the incentive program.

The bleedinghearts supporting character development of course are outraged that character and excellent achievement gets rewarded at all.

Welcome to the real world where in work you’re graded every day and reap rewards if you’re exceptional.

Posted by T.C. on 10/23 at 11:53 AM

This is certainly heading in the right direction, and I agree completely with T. C. that in the real world, yes, it’s the hard work that usually reaps rewards, so why not teach the same to our children? 
However, every time I hear of good grades, I can’t help but think that with no provincial standardized tests, what does 60% mean; what does getting an ‘A’ mean?  Teachers and department heads write their own exams, so how do these tests reflect the curricula when the ministry never sees these tests nor sets guidelines or standards for them.
We all know that colleges and universities find highschool marks dubious.

Posted by Bev Koski on 10/23 at 01:08 PM

>Welcome to the real world where in work you?re graded every day and reap rewards if you?re exceptional

Not in the world of public school teaching. Google “tall poppy syndrome.”  If your results are too much better than others’ you will be disciplined or neutralized in one way or another.

We have to perpetuate the myth that all schools, teachers and students are equal—not equal in human value or rights, but equal in achievement and outcome.

Posted by urbanteach on 10/27 at 06:37 AM

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Dateline: Boston, MA

Previous entry: Roadwork Ahead