Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Beware The Tools of Totalitarianism

April 23, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:06 AM

William Sherer’s The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich makes interesting reading, especially when it comes to how the government used its schools to brainwash German children. Here’s what Hitler had to say about his program to indoctrinate the country’s youth into rabid nationalism, anti-semitism, and Naziism. “‘When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side’, he said in a speech on November 6, 1933, I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already’.” And of course he was right, for the most part. 

In addition to using the schools to control the German people, Hitler also used the press. Here is an interesting passage from The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich that illustrates how powerful these tools can be. 

“I myself was to experience how easily one is taken in by a lying and censored press and radio in a totalitarian state. Though like most Germans I had daily access to foreign newspapers, espcially those of London, Paris, and Zurich, which arrived the day after publication, and though I listened regularly to the BBC and other foreign broadcasts, my job necessitated the spending of many hours a day in combing the German press, checking the German radio, conferring with Nazi officials and going to party meetings. It was surprising and sometimes consternating to find that notwithstanding the opportunities I had to learn the facts and despite one’s inherent distrust of what one learned from Nazi sources, a steady diet over the years of falsifications and distortions made a certain impression on one’s mind and often misled it. No one who has not lived for years in a totalitarian land can possibly conceive how difficult it is to escape the dread consequences of a regime’s calculated and incessant propaganda. Often in a German home or office or sometimes in a casual conversation with a stranger in a restaurant, a beer hall, a café, I would meet with the most outlandish assertions from seemingly educated and intelligent persons. It was obvious that they parroting some piece of nonsense they had heard on the radio or read in the newspapers. Sometimes one was tempted to say as much, but on such occasions one was met with such a stare of incredulity, such a shock of silence, as if one had blasphemed the Almighty, that one realized how useless it was even to try to make contact with a mind which had become warped and for whom the facts of life had become what Hitler and Goebbels, with their cynical disregard for truth, said they were.”

Canadians are very lucky to be living in a free country, and we must be ever on guard against the possibility of losing our freedom to a government that is tempted to use the tools of totalitarianism to advance its own agenda.

Comments

Yes, we may very well be free, but since the aftermath of the Nazi regime, the propaganda tools were refined and developed in all areas of business, public institutions, and the growth of public relations, and where propaganda theory is taught in large doses, under the disguise of harmless titles. Along the way behavioural theory connected with propaganda, according to the people who work in both fields, it was a natural progression, because the main problem is people’s behaviour, and how people’s behaviour gets in the way of change, and goals of governments.

No where do you see this action, is our public education system. It is in the little daily activities and conversations that take place, with parents and their children.

I will used only one example, that shows the experience of a parent and his child, who has early reading difficulties. This is based on my own experience, but it is the experience of a lot of parents out there.

In grade 1, I began to worry about the difficulties that my child was having in reading and writing. The school was saying, do not worry, she will catch up on her own. Common saying, where it tells the parent to do nothing. Meanwhile, at home I was discussing my worries with other family members, insisting she needs help, and the school was not doing anything. Well, the response dare I say, much the say way as this; “I would meet with the most outlandish assertions from seemingly educated and intelligent persons. It was obvious that they parroting some piece of nonsense they had heard on the radio or read in the newspapers”

Almost all family member tore a strip into me, how dare I question the teacher. The teacher knows best. As time went on, they actually went out of their way to urge me to accept my child’s limitations and that she is slow.

What was behind it, was another common misconception that schools find very useful to relay to parents in some type of covering to hide the meaning. ‘Children who are struggling with reading in the early grades, are children who are slow.’ A lot of people believe this, and the education system allows this belief, to remain in a lot of people’s minds. Even today, there is still family members that think, among other parents in my child’s class that the only reason she is doing well, is become I am doing all the work for her. I often respond when I hear that remark, how do I help her, if she is taking a test at school, since I am not there?  The responses have range from I am supplying her to cheat, to getting advance copies of the tests, or the more common reply, it was just a fluke she did so well.

The public education system find it very useful, to employed propaganda and behavioural tools, the use of steady diet of mantras, until the majority of the people believe it and when there is snags as there is with children, parents have a difficult time to get the help for their children, It forces parents to become even more dependent on the school, because of the lack of support from other parents and their beliefs.

This is probably the number one reason, the school system, gets away not employing research-based curriculum and practices. There is no need too, because there is no demand for it, except from a very small group of parents.

Posted by Nancy on 04/23 at 11:15 AM

Polls Also A Tool of Totalitarianism

Good.  We’re in a free country, so we can talk openly about concerns and issues.  Hitler’s statement:  “Your child belongs to us already.” is a great quote, and I applaud SQE for bringing that forward.

Also thanks for initiating the topic of ‘‘totalitarianism” generally—in a “free” country—Canada.

Here we can talk about tons of tricks of the trade of how to shape people’s beliefs and behaviors. 

A frequent poster mentions how regular polling is done by the unions to sample people’s opinions.  Yes, that is done to see how much they can get away with.

Today in the Vancouver Sun is a glaring headline: British Columbians want to see more public education funding: poll http://www.vancouversun.com/news/British+Columbians+want+more+public+education+funding+poll/2939109/story.html

Just reading 50 of the 100 plus comments so far, I see that a number or people are rather dubious about the credibility of the poll.  “He who pays the piper, calls the tune” is the tone of some comments. 

Yes, the credibility of the poll is very suspect. 

We have not seen the questions asked, how slanted they may appear, etc. 

Angus Reid was the pollster.  How much did it cost?  Who paid?  What were the questions?

Sorry, I don’t have time to pursue this right now ...Pile of grandchildren to look after this weekend.

Perhaps someone with a real “conspiracy theory” mind could drill down on this one.

Posted by Tunya Audain on 04/23 at 12:18 PM

I can also add something, that goes hand in hand with how ideas get cemented in the public’s mind.

This gets me extremely upset, because it is tying intelligence with the ability to read. The more intelligent, the better reader you become, Any reader would draw that conclusion. The simple message, as opposed to the more complicated message.

“Overall, the study shows that teacher quality makes a difference in reading achievement because it has a moderating effect on genetic differences. At high levels of teacher quality, there was greater genetic variance, “meaning that a good bit of why the kids in those classrooms differ had to do with their genetic differences,” Taylor explained.”

Essentially, the reader is led to believe that it is genetics, the plays the greater role in learning to read, but the good news teachers can play the greatest impact.

Sounds good and even reasonable. Until you hit the reason, why the study was put in place.

“Last week, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist vetoed a teacher pay and tenure bill that would have based teacher evaluations used in determining teacher pay, in part, on student achievements, the Miami Herald reported. The governor called the bill “significantly flawed,” it said.

But the idea remains alive and well. Lawmakers in a number of states are considering linking teacher pay to student performance.

The problem, Taylor reasoned, is that kids bring their own differences to the classroom, including behavioral problems, learning disabilities and difficulties with English. “I think requiring that teachers pay be tied to performance is a really dangerous and a problematic idea just given the state of science,” she said.

Olson echoed those concerns. “It’s laying the blame on teachers for kids struggling. It’s not fair and, I’ll tell you, teachers are getting pretty fed up with it,” he said.”

Worth repeating once more, ““I think requiring that teachers pay be tied to performance is a really dangerous and a problematic idea just given the state of science,” she said.”

The learning and cognitive sciences are the next guys up to take the hit, so teachers are NOT tied to any performance measures. As for parents and children, that tiresome line that parents often here, I just was not born with any brains.

I suspect we can look forward to this in the far future, Hearing the same mantra, over and over, teacher quality + genetics = improves reading, along with other academics.

Oh, it makes me so mad, that once again teachers are using children, to avoid the real problems, and a lot of it, is based on junk science.

http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/638388.html

Posted by Nancy on 04/23 at 01:01 PM

Rampant paranoia.

Tunya you will love this one. New poll of BC residents conducted by the Angus Reid group.

Is BC Cambell government doing enough to protect public education? 81% = NO

Should the govenment increase funding for public education? 79% YES

Should government contiue to fund private schools? 66% = NO

Be careful of that public opinion becuse it seldom supports the conservative view of education.

Posted by Doug on 04/23 at 01:11 PM

That’d be the poll commissioned by the BC Society for Public Education, right?

Obviously a group without any pre-conceived views of how to do “education”.

That poll shows mostly that folks who buy polls can arrange for them to show whatever results they want.

Posted by John L on 04/23 at 01:33 PM

John L. - right you are!!

BC Society for Public Education, People for Education = the same sort of spin and bluster, twists of their own surveys designed to say exactly what they wish.

Not at all a random sampling but more speaking to the converted.

Shhh…..the Doug’s of this world think most are buying it.
They’re not.

Posted by Chuck on 04/23 at 02:46 PM

Angus Reid group is a professional polling organization and they are not, any of them, in a position to have their methodology or credibility questioned because they will not get credible work in the future. The reputation of the polling firm is at stake, not the reputation of the BCSPE. The opinions are so overwhelming that, no matter who paid for the poll the results would be the same,
(+ or - 4% 19 times out of 20)

Posted by Doug on 04/23 at 03:16 PM

The BC poll, was conducted online.

Only 800 polled, and that is online.

Very leading questions, and anyone would agree, that the public education system needs more funding, and ditto for the third question, which most people would no to more funding for private schools.

Here is the link.

http://www.bcspe.ca/public-opinion-survey-2010/

And Doug, even Angus Reid will tell you online polls has major problems and should not be taken as serious as other polls, such as phone or person to person. Plus it only had three question. Not much to go on.

Posted by Nancy on 04/23 at 03:40 PM

Where is your poll that says the opposite? These polls stand on their own until someone shows they are not true. Until then they ARE public opinion.

Posted by Doug on 04/23 at 04:01 PM

The polling firm will obviously claim that the results are an accurate response to the questions being asked, and they may well be.  The issue is that the organization buying the poll can have the questions being asked reflect whatever they want.

Who actually determined which questions, all three of them, should be asked?

The devil is always in the details; polls commissioned by an organization with a predisposition toward what the poll results will show are always suspect.

I’m a little surprised that’s news.

Posted by John L on 04/23 at 04:04 PM

Or maybe it deosn’t matter much. 

There’s no need to produce an alternative poll if the one being offered is so dodgy as to be meaningless, like it or not.

Posted by John L on 04/23 at 04:07 PM

If you don’t believe that the overwhelming majority of people want more money for public education and a significant majority wants no money given to private schools, you really are totally out of touch with reality.

The same result comes from every poll asked in this area.

Posted by Doug on 04/23 at 04:21 PM

Doug, you must have very rare reading problem, the one that you only read what you believe in, and ignore the rest.

The first question:
Question 1:
Preamble: The provincial government has made decisions that increase the cost of running public schools, for example, increasing MSP premiums. Some school boards say they must cut services to students to pay for these and other cost increases.
Thinking about this, do you agree or disagree that the province needs to do more to protect public education?

Question 2:
Preamble: The provincial government has made decisions that increase the cost of running public schools, for example, increasing MSP premiums. Some school boards say they must cut services to students to pay for these and other cost
increases.
Thinking about this, do you agree or disagree that the province should increase funding to public education?

Question 3:
Preamble: More than 85 per cent of private schools in B.C. receive funding from the provincial government. These schools receive between 35 and 50 percent of the per-pupil grant given to public schools.
Thinking about this, do you agree or disagree that the provincial government should continue to use public funds to support private schools?

The questions are leading questions, and only one saving grace, it has choices of strongly agree to not sure, but one is missing, the neutral one. Otherwise, if you scroll down the page, there is a PDF file, that has the breakdown, including income and region. The link is the last post. And Doug, this type of poll, can be taken anywhere in the world, and still get the same results. The questions are slanted, to make the school board look like the guy that has been beaten up by the ministry. As for the third question, some would read, and conclude that private schools are taking 50 % of the funding away from another public school.

As Tunya has stated, polls are a tool of Totalitarianism. Since we were in a democracy, polls are a favourite such as the BC poll, and are conducted to change people’s opinion on issues that sometimes have very strong opinions against public organizations, such as school boards or unions. Have enough polls over time, there will have a stronger case for more money, in this case. These days the people who make decisions, I sometimes wonder what kind of abilities and skills they have, to form good reasoning and logical decisions. 

But what really surprises me, is the actions of some, who will make sweeping and general statements based on polls only. And when another may say no, I don’t think so, they end up being the crazy ones. “Sometimes one was tempted to say as much, but on such occasions one was met with such a stare of incredulity, such a shock of silence, as if one had blasphemed the Almighty, that one realized how useless it was even to try to make contact with a mind which had become warped and for whom the facts of life had become what Hitler and Goebbels, with their cynical disregard for truth, said they were.“

Even Hitler conducted polls too, and heaven forbid if it did not live up to his expectations or the way he saw the world.

Posted by Nancy on 04/23 at 05:08 PM

About the only thing they didn’t do was poke people with a pointed stick to pick the right answer.

The questions are asked in such a way, and with only one “right” answer, as to be absurd.

Posted by John L on 04/23 at 05:17 PM

I work in the polling industry. Questions look fine to me.

What next, voting is totaliterian if people don’t vote your way? Many people on this board must get something clear in their heads. Most people in Ontario and Canada do not agree with funding private education and the vast majority favour more money for public schools.

I know you have trouble with this but this is a fact.

Posted by Doug on 04/23 at 05:23 PM

See what I mean guys, a very rare reading disorder.
One only reads what they want to read. Polls become facts, and the truth become lies. He would have fitted well in Nazi Germany, being part of the cheer leading section.

My parents taught me one thing, and reinforced at school, draw your conclusions from all facets of an issue. Before you opine, gather the background knowledge. Propagandists and behaviorists do not like thinking people, we are are too hard to change with present day techniques.

P.S. I have taught my youngest, correcting the mistake I made with the other two. My youngest is quite the debater with the teachers, pointing out the inconsistencies of stances. She is a real pain in the a_ _ with her adult brothers and sisters. When she wants something, she gathers the background knowledge, presents it to me in such a way, that I would respond favourable to her request. The latest being, acquiring a second ferret. I have said no, but her arguments are quite persuasive. I wonder how Doug would do having her in his classroom?

P.S. Even my own 14 year old , would say that is a terrible poll, and point out all that is wrong with it. They were taught how to of polls two years ago, and she has taken it to heart, since she is quite excellent at statistical math.

Posted by Nancy on 04/23 at 05:48 PM

If the poll looks great to you feel free to quote it whenever you like and the rest of us will take it for what its worth.

That’s the beauty of things here; there’s no obligation to be ordered to accept anything.  Those who are able to back up their claims with compelling arguments will be respected; those who try and impose their views will be looked on with scepticism.

This isn’t high school anymore and the methods that may, just may, have worked there don’t cut it here.

Posted by John L on 04/23 at 05:57 PM

“Totalitarianism is the possession of reality by a political Idea — the Idea of the socialist kingdom of heaven on earth, the redemption of humanity by political force.  To radical believers, this Idea is so beautiful it is like God himself.  It provides the meaning of a radical life.  It is the solution that makes everything possible; it is the end that justifies every regrettable means.  Belief in the kingdom of socialist heaven is the faith that transforms vice into virtue, lies into truth, evil into good.  For in the revolutionary religion, the Way, the Truth and the Life of salvation lie not with God above but with men below — ruthless, brutal, venal men — on whom the faith confers the power of gods.”

David Horowitz, in Peter Collier and David Horowitz, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts about the Sixties (New York, 1989), page 287.

Posted by Charles Tysoe on 04/24 at 12:13 PM

So, are you a totalitarian if you advocate making society substantially more socialist by democratic means through elections?

David Horowitz is a nut job.

Posted by Doug on 04/24 at 12:27 PM

Doug, a totalitarian system is very much part of our democratic system. The prime example is our House of Commons, who rather expound on the most trivial manners, and no debate on the important issues of the day. Our MPs do not represent the people, but represent the party. Ergo, the people’s voice is silence, in favour of the few. It does not matter which party is in, the system is design like a totalitarian system, with the outward appearance of a democracy.

There is a lot more to a democracy than elections. My ancestors did not work as hard as they did, where only the well-to-do can access democracy, and take advantage of their rights.

David Horowitz is no more radical than the left-leaning individuals, who do sometimes state inane and absurd allegations to make a point. However, he does have valid points of what is happening at the American universities and colleges.

Posted by Nancy on 04/24 at 04:34 PM

If all the smart right wingers want to make money and all the smart left wingers want to be professors, guess what you get?

Boo hoo.

Posted by Doug on 04/24 at 09:02 PM

What to make of a “smart leftwinger” soliciting advertisers for his website.  Wouldn’t that make him a capitalist…and we all know what they’re like.

Life is very rarely as black and white as some see it.

Posted by John L on 04/25 at 10:44 AM

Polls Can Easily Become A Tool Of Totalitarianism

BC is experiencing a deluge of organized attacks and destabilization maneuvers to force more funding for government schools. 

Even though throughout the rest of the world the same constraints on public spending are being felt, and school spending is seriously being cut back, BC seems to be experiencing more than its share of grief from the lobbies which benefit from the education tax dollar. 

Thus, we see the call for more funding for public service workers – teachers—in our schools, rather than more efficient spending of money.  That independent schools do “more with less” is a thorn in the side of the public government schools.

On another blog, one in Ontario (School for Thought), we were discussing tools of totalitarianism and how the media was used to ensnare citizens to totalitarian thinking.  The article started out with Hitler having said “Your child belongs to us already”’ and then we discussed how a totalitarian state used propaganda techniques to brainwash.

I contributed a classic case of how polls can be used to contribute to totalitarianism and I provided the link to the Vancouver Sun story about the Angus Reid poll:  “Most British Columbians want more public-school funding: poll”.

This poll was commissioned by a group whose aim is in the name:  BC Society for Public Education.  Therefore, you know that they lobby for more public education and, of course, for less competition from independent schools.  And that is what the poll delivered. 

Briefly, there were three questions: 1) Should the government do more to support public education; 2) to increase funding for public education, and 3) to continue funding private schools?  The scores were 81% YES 79% YES and 64% NO.  What an outstanding result!  It garnered considerable mileage in the press and meetings. The poll achieved what the client wanted.

The newspaper, however, through its blogging ability, received over 100 comments and, unfortunately (for the lobby), some serious questions were raised:

1.  Were the questions loaded? Or leading?
2.  Isn’t Angus Reid polling rather questionable considering they are left-wing and support massive social spending?  Don’t they use questionable polling techniques, that is, online polling?
3.  Who is behind this poll and who pays?

Posted by Tunya Audain on 04/25 at 03:42 PM

Polls Can Easily Become A Tool Of Totalitarianism II

The answers:
1.  See the pdf for the questions. http://www.scribd.com/full/30311572?access_key=key-u1vfkvolw0eiygqp0qj
Note how the preamble leads to a “correct” answer.  How it “primes the pump”, so to speak, for the waterworks to follow.  The questions were well “crafted”, manufactured.

2.  The online polling is questionable. The “random selection” was done from the Angus Reid Forum, a self-volunteered array of citizens who get points for surveys taken, and qualify for monthly awards of $1000, $100, or other perks.  The left-wing swing of the principal of the company is well noted in his writings.

3.  The group commissioning the poll has been in place since 2005 and with Board members long associated with “progressive” activism, including Patti Bacchus, current chair of the VSB.  (Wouldn’t they just love to deflect an accounting probe away from the VSB?)  Two current BCSPE Board members, Helesia Luke and Catherine Evans, run a communications, public relations, guerilla marketing company.  Their literature includes these statements: “How you ask questions is important – language matters”, and “Asking questions influences groups in some way.” Funding for BCSPE and expensive polls – who know?

What if, what if the poll did have more credibility.  That is, what if a disinterested group (one without an agenda or self-interest) commissioned a poll on these issues?  Suppose someone, just for an academic exercise, repeated such a survey, but with a different slant to the questions and preamble, could they have achieved a result of 81% NO, 79 % NO to more support or funding for public education, and 64% YES for continued funding for private schools?

The headlines would scream:  “8 out of 10 British Columbians want government to stop supporting and funding public education: poll”.  “2 out of 3 want more funding for private schools: poll”.

Wishful thinking?  SURPRISE.  The Angus Reid Chief Research Officer, Andrew Grenville, coincidentally on the same day as the BCSPE newsrelease came out (Apr 21, 2010), illustrates my point— that with the right questions you can get exactly 180 degree different answers, 100% opposites!  Please see this article:  Why The Way You Ask a Question Can Determine The Answer.  http://www.visioncritical.com/2010/04/why-the-way-you-ask-a-question-can-determine-the-answer/

So, is this education underfunding crisis in BC a magnificent example of engineering disinformation and propaganda by ideological stakeholders? Isn’t that how agent provocateurs work?

Posted by Tunya Audain on 04/25 at 03:43 PM

Tunya, You sound like a cross between the Tea Party wing nuts and the Flat Earth Society.

This is an organization that takes the Fraser Institute and CD Howe seriously. Nuff said.

Posted by Doug on 04/25 at 04:45 PM

Projected deficit for year 2010-2011 of the VSB, is 18.2 million.

The solution, is to make cuts and we don’t need to make a guess on that one, a big area is special education and resources.  The main mandate is to maintain funding in the regular classroom.

I don’t know about others, but I would think an independent audit is in order. One would think, that a great deal of parents would be upset with the cuts taking place, but since parents are not even privy to financial statements of schools, a lot probably do not know what to think. Blame the school board or blame the government or blame them both. I am saying this, to make a point on the time of the year these polls are being run.

At this time, parents are pre-occupied with other things, such awaiting for school to be over with, and worry about it another time, when they have less on their minds. I suspect if polls were run sometime in mid-October, the polls might be the opposite of what they anticipated. Ditto probably for the second week in January, and about one week before school closes.

If I was a concern parent in Vancouver, I would take advantage of this poll, and finding other parents, who work for a living in accounting, marketing firms, and other professionals that would take the cuts, and project what the results are, if it took place. For example, long waiting lists to be access, increase in class sizes in the primary grades or the resulting effect, of eliminating vice-principals in schools under the size of 200. Published it , and see what feathers would be ruffled.

Now, I have a question. The NL board that I am under, had a revenue of 365 million dollars for 2009, with a student population of 41, 000, over a large urban and rural district.
The Vancouver board, had a operating revenue of 557 million dollars and 56,000 students.

All numbers are rounded. Now for a little bit of math, and very rough figures.
For NL per student -  $8902
For V per student - $9946
A difference of $1044.

The difference can be explained by salaries, and cost of living factors, where Vancouver cost more to live in, than any part of NL.
Teachers salaries take the major share of the education dollar. Not news to anyone, but I do have a question.

The way the education boards operate, is this system sustainable in 10 years from now? And perhaps in 5 years from now?  If Vancouver follows through with the cuts, and as of now the NL board has been given another increase, will the NL board out-pace Vancouver in terms of spending?  I have other questions too, that I find odd, that places at both end of the country, in very different circumstances, are more or less paying about the same, and if this exercise took place at each board, would we find more or less the same amount?

I have always maintain that the system as it is spends far too much money on things that could have been prevented in the first place. If children were taught how to read well, fair writing, and good numeracy skills, there would be no need at the middle, and at the end for remedial help, adult schools, far less alternative schools (behaviour problem kids), and of course far fewer kids needed special services, and more money at the high school level for course selection, and courses that are in demand in today’s economy.

Would it not make sense to anyone, if they were provided with the information the long-term costs related to the board, the cuts that take place, and services that are denied, the approaches to reading , writing at the primary grades. are all examples of paying the piper much later on, and in most cases it is the taxpayer that is picking up the costs. The only ones that get a free pass, are the people who work in the system.

I think there would be hell to pay from the parents and taxpayers, who may not be all that aware that not providing effecting reading curriculum for primary grades, taxpayers may be footing the bill in later years for 60 % of the students for remedial and corrective services. It is in these areas, where unions take great advantage, of situations, where the public does not have the knowledge or be privy to, like the people within the system.

Posted by Nancy on 04/25 at 05:57 PM

You are off by a decimal point Nancy, VSB deficit $1.8 million.

Posted by Doug on 04/26 at 09:33 AM

Doug, typical tactic of those to relay false information, of facts that is based on the truth.
In fact the figure of 18.2 million, which came from a draft, should be updated to the latest figure of 18.12 million. Another Vancouver school board is dealing with a projected figure of 8 million dollars.

But facts do not bother the real agenda of the Dougs of the world, to teach nothing, for more pay, and wash their hands of the many failures and blame it on the parents, and who ever else is nearby. Accountability is not in the picture.

For those that want a more balance view, here is the link, that I could not find very easily, on a site that seems to make it very hard for the typical user to access, when they use a lousy search engine, and unfriendly format.
http://www.vsb.bc.ca/advocacy

Who would have thought that it would be under the title of Trustees’ advocacy work. No wonder I had a problem, since the natural category would have been under finances, and I never thought budgets, would be part of advocate work, but than again, we are dealing with the public education system, and there use of language, that sometimes defies logic and reason.

Posted by Nancy on 04/26 at 09:54 AM

Oooops it is $18 million. I read it in a Chinese newspaper highly critical of overnment education cutbacks.

I’m sure you noticed over the weekend, the BC trustees association, normally quite conservative, revolted over government funding shortfalls and passed a motion calling for an end to government funding of private schools if they are not going to fund public schools properly.

BC is headed for a showdown as the NDP is moving towards a position of no money for privat schools leaving the government to defend the very unpopular policy. A luxury people can no longer afford.

Posted by Doug on 04/26 at 11:56 AM

Doug, I guess it is getting pretty hard to defend the practices of school boards, and unions. As for the reason that you stated, even if private school funding was withdrawn, it would do little for to impact the current deficit, nor the current direction of the board, and the heavy influence of the teachers’ unions directing the board to go after the so-called luxuries of an education.

Special education, tutoring, music, arts programs, and the elimination of vice-principals of schools under 500, all in a bid to keep the status-quo. The status-quo of supporting the ever rising salary costs, without the accountability at any level.

Soon, public schools left unchecked, will be telling the parents, the only responsibility the school has, is to educate the child on their social responsibilities, and the parents need to ensure their child is getting an education else where.

BC and the other provinces are going to have a showdown, and my bets are there will be defining moments, where the public education system, will be reform with or without their support., and be force to comply with research-based proven methods and accountability rules, for all stakeholders.

Posted by Nancy on 04/26 at 12:19 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Mozart Worked His Butt Off

Previous entry: Sex-Ed Controversy