Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Becuz its crewel, innit?

November 25, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:45 AM

The Writing’s On the Wall

HT to Jo-Anne for this sobering article from the Telegraph in the UK.  The great phonics debate continues over the pond, despite some of the most convincing evidence from UK reading research showing that systematic phonics instruction is the way to go.  SQE has often cited the Clackmannanshire study, and other similar studies, for example.    Diane Pearson’s article is a response to a white paper has just been released in the UK which calls for a complete overhaul of how teachers are trained.   UK Education Secretary, Michael Gove, proposes, for instance, that teachers be trained outside of the usual faculties of education and do more in-school, hands-on training similar to how medical interns train.

Diane Pearson, recalls her own experience as a novice teacher thirty years before who was instructed during her teacher-training days not to help her student sound out words.  “We don’t do that here,” she was told, but was to encourage “kids to ‘become active constructors of their own learning.”  Of course we know the disastrous results that ensued decades later.  Fast-forward thirty years and she notes that the current crop of novice teachers who learned under the same ineffective methods are now not even aware of their own ignorance when it comes to language.  It’s a case of the blind leading the blind. 

Pearson adds her solutions for teacher training in reading instruction: “Rid the Education department of anyone clinging to discredited theories.  Make the failure to teach phonics in primary schools illegal.”   SQE says, hurrah to that.

While most educrats wring their hands over why boys don’t like to read, Pearson writes, “Point out to your critics there is nothing that puts a child off reading quite as much as the inability to read.”  She concludes, “At long last, the writing is on the wall.  The tragedy is that so many cannot read it.”

Problem is, it’s the educrats who can’t see it either.

Comments

It is becoming more and more apparent that Canada has a need for a Federal Department of Education-we are the only ones without a reform movement-SQE needs more support!

Posted by Jo-Anne Gross on 11/25 at 08:56 AM

In England, they’re hesitant as to whether 12 year-olds who threaten via facebook to cut their classmates’ throats, should be, say, suspended or expelled.

Why would they be open to learning how to read and spell? (the admins, not the kids)

Posted by Charles Tysoe on 11/25 at 11:24 AM

In Pearson’s article the writing may be on the wall in the U.K. but here in Canada that’s exactly the problem.

We’re expecting too much from our “experts” and educators (not always one and the same).

Perhaps if that writing on the wall were dumbed down to cute fuzzy pictures it would finally sink in…...not holding my breath though.

Posted by Chuck on 11/26 at 07:19 AM

Pearson is off base.  At no time in my fifty years as a teacher and reading consultant were we told not to teach phonics.  Everyone knows it would be impossible to read without knowing the sounds of letters. Today, you would be hard pressed to find a school, around the world, where phonics is not the focus of reading instruction from kindergarten on so why are so many kids failing to learn to read?  Reading is making sense and just because students can sound out words doesn’t mean they can make sense of what they are sounding out.  Struggling readers suffer from too much phonics teaching.

Posted by Vera Goodman on 12/04 at 11:16 AM

Vera,did you do phonemic awareness -starts at the articulation level-
There`s is a massive difference-
Phonics is step 2 and I have seen many flawed phonics programs-
NICHD Research study-longitudinal and with a half a billion dollar budget as well as National Reading Panel confirm and have concluded it`s the optimal way to learn to read.Explicit Systematic Synthetic Phonics-doing the 5 prongs.Phonemic awareness,phonics,fluency training,vocabulary and comprehension.
Your statements about comprehension are correct but decoding explicitness and ease referred to as fluency are the first requirement to comprehension,naturally bundled with vocabulary growth and instruction as well as background knowledge when reading stories.

Posted by Jo-Anne Gross on 12/04 at 12:42 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: A Win-Win Proposition

Previous entry: More Money Is Not The Answer