Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconSubscribe to our Blog

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

An Apparent Paradox

June 04, 2010 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 08:00 AM

This University Affairs article is interesting in that it offers more evidence that Ontario high school graduates are more and more poorly prepared for university. The author believes that there was an abrupt change (for the worse) about five years previously. He goes on to offer six possible explanations: changes to the curriculum; the introduction of standardized testing; the elimination of grade 13; grade inflation; the popularity of video games; and Internet reliance.

It’s hard to understand how any of these explanations could have caused an abrupt change five years before, given that they had all occurred more than ten years previously. The author thinks that “the rapid decline in performance over the last five years has its roots in the teaching at the elementary level” and assigns primary blame to the changes to the curriculum and the introduction of standardized testing. He believes that the new curriculum is a mile wide and an inch deep, such that teachers don’t have time to teach conceptual understanding and analytical skills. Furthermore, the provincial tests induce teachers to focus on teaching students to memorize formulae and other similar strategies. 

School for Thought is not convinced that these explanations are accurate. In fact, we have noted a very strong emphasis on higher-order skills, both in the revised Ontario curriculum and in the provincial tests. We wonder whether there is not TOO MUCH emphasis on conceptual understanding, and not enough on basic skills, in elementary classrooms. As this American Federation of Teachers article, Basic Skills Versus Conceptual Understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education, explains, “the precision and fluency in the execution of the skills are the requisite vehicles to convey the conceptual understanding. There is not ‘conceptual understanding’ and ‘problem-solving skill’ on the one hand and ‘basic skills’ on the other. Nor can one acquire the former without the latter.”

School for Thought suggests that the decline in university entrants’ conceptual understanding and analytical ability may - ironically - have its roots in an increased emphasis on conceptual understanding and analytical ability in elementary classrooms.

Comments

Yes, the decline in conceptual understanding and analytical ability is rooted in elementary school. There is not enough emphasis on the basics.

The funny thing about math, is one can do any advance math, providing their have a solid grounding of what I call the arithmetic facts. Schools do not spend any time on the basics. What is common, are the drill sheets that are sent home for extra practice.  The drill sheets are seen as separate from the concept. There is no connections being made connected the drill sheet to the concept that is being understood. As a result, kids are memorizing, instead of obtaining an understanding.

My daughter did not do well in that kind of instruction. She needed to understand the hows, before she could understand the whys. In today’s math classes, the whys of the concept is explain first, and the how does not matter much. Kids like my daughter, or for most kids, it is confusing and can lead to a hatred of math. Kids need to be taught the how first, than understanding comes with making the connection of the whys.

No one would be having a problem with math, if the how is explain first, than the practice and than the whys.

As for the possible explanations that is listed, only one should be considered, and that is curriculum changes. I just heard that the high school math course is being watered down, with the elimination of trig concepts, some algebra concepts, and as well as geometry concepts. The emphasis is making math fun, and concentrating on group activities. As my daughter reported to me, she thanking her lucky stars, she does not have to deal with the new math course. Her final comment to me, how on earth to do you figure out an algebra expression by cutting out pieces of paper?  I have no idea either, but I do think learning the basics, one can skipped cutting out pieces of papers.

Posted by Nancy on 06/04 at 10:05 AM

“The author thinks that “the rapid decline in performance over the last five years has its roots in the teaching at the elementary level” and assigns primary blame to the changes to the curriculum and the introduction of standardized testing.”

I’m not as easily swayed by this as is Nancy(above). It sounds to me as if the author is placing blame on testing at the elementary level and not the teachers ability to teach the curriculum upon which the testing is(or should be) based.

I also notice that this article is a few years old, so would like to see more current numbers.

Something to consider in all of this as well, is that some kids in preparation for post-secondary are being taught to accept that failing a subject(s) in university is not just acceptable but to be expected.

Does that not let the secondary teachers right off the old hook and move the problem along leaving the post-secondaries to deal with it?

What does that teach our students…really?

Nancy “As for the possible explanations that is listed, only one should be considered, and that is curriculum changes. I just heard that the high school math course is being watered down, with the elimination of trig concepts, some algebra concepts, and as well as geometry concepts.”  not surprising for a gov’t that has amended the math curriculum significantly and a few times over their time in power.

Once again they’re pushing the problem along for the post-secondaries to clean up.

However, where are the cries of protest from our colleges and universities? All I’m hearing is silence and maybe a “cha-ching” as the post-secondaries coffers grow from incoming students needing to take their make-up courses because the student didn’t get the basics to even begin at the post-secondary level.

Posted by Chuck on 06/06 at 08:53 AM

Ontario graduates more people from post secondary than any province in Canada and more than almost every country on Earth.

90% of the students get 60% or better on all standardized tests/ This is considered excellent by world standards.

Posted by Doug on 06/06 at 09:37 AM

“Ontario graduates more people from post secondary than any province in Canada and more than almost every country on Earth. ”

whether they deserve it or not.

smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors

Posted by Chuck on 06/06 at 11:05 AM

At the university level, the math,  english, science and history professors are very much complaining on the state of public schooling.  As one said to me a few years ago, it is rare for the ministry of education and the boards to consult with them, using their expertise, Instead, the boards and the ministry relies on their own in-house experts and outside consultants that are usually connected with the publishers in some way or form.

Posted by Nancy on 06/06 at 11:46 AM

To probe the claim that Ontario graduates more people from post-secondary than any province in Canada, visit this Statistics Canada site -  http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-595-m/2009078/c-g/c-g003-eng.htm - which indicates that in 2006/07 (the latest years for which I could find figures) Ontario’s secondary graduation rate was slighly below the national average.
To probe the claim that Ontario graduates more people from post-secondary than almost every country on earth, visit this OECD site - http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/11/43619343.pdf  - and scroll down to page 19 to look at 2007 national secondary graduation rates. The OECD reports that Canada places just below the OECD average.

I would have no idea how to go about determining the accuracy of the claim that it is considered excellent by world standards when 90% of students score 60% or better.

Posted by mdare on 06/06 at 02:23 PM

I post was on the POST-secondary graduation rate. Malkin countered with the SECONDARY graduation rate. Not the same thing. Alberta graduates more people directly to work just as an example. When Ontario does something it is usually close to the national average because, at 44% of English Canada, it also determines any weighted average.

Posted by Doug on 06/06 at 03:42 PM

OK, well with regard to post-secondary, the same OECD document reports on this sector as well - http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/11/43619343.pdf - and it seems that Canada does significantly WORSE (as in near the bottom) than the OECD average when it comes to the graduation rates from tertiary education (p. 21).
Unfortunately, I don’t have time at the moment to do a comprehensive search for post-secondary graduation rates by province, but here’s what a quick search turned up. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-582-x/2007001/c-g/update-misadate200806/5203277-eng.htm In 2005, Ontario ranked third in terms of its university graduation rates.

Posted by mdare on 06/06 at 04:28 PM

Universities have been complaining about the latest crop of students since almost Socrates who thought he saw a real decline in his incoming students. Nothing new in any of this. The universities are perfectly free to set a stiff entrance exam if they like. Then they can explain to the profs how they drove away half the kids.

Posted by Doug on 06/08 at 10:18 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Leave A Comment

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: