Education leaders are letting teachers down
Apparently, something like 94% of teachers believe that students perform better when lessons are delivered in their preferred learning style. This fad has swept the edworld, spawning countless workshops and manuals and other money-making endeavours, even though it has been totally debunked by cognitive scientists and empirical research.
So I was thinking about this in the context of most teachers' apparent belief that good teachers are born, not made. (I base this statement on most teachers' lack of interest in learning about what the more successful teacher down the hall is doing.)
If teachers are told to implement practices like teaching modalities (pedagogy which is, let's face it, tremendously difficult to implement given very heterogeneous classes of 25 students) but experience no success when they do so, what then can they conclude but that they are not very good teachers? No doubt they assume that the teacher down the hall is way more successful because he or she is a much better teacher who can make teaching modalities work - when the truth is that the successful teacher down the hall is probably ignoring all the BS about teaching modalities and instead using proven pedagogical practices like direct instruction.
Long story short: the pressure on teachers to use unproven - or even disproven - teaching techniques contributes to their feelings of professional inadequacy. Not only do these fads hurt students, they also hurt teachers and the teaching profession in general. H/T Chas




“...when the truth is that the successful teacher down the hall is probably ignoring all the BS about teaching modalities and instead using proven pedagogical practices like direct instruction.”
Brought up a memory, when my youngest was in JK. The parent-teacher interviews at the time was a 15 to 20 minute affair, with a two page written summary of my child. At the first one, I was asked to checked off the boxes of learning styles. Being the oldest mom, I looked at her, saying, are you serious? The teacher with well over 25 years practice under her belt, said to me, it is part of the administration requirements but I don’t pay any attention to it, because I believe all children learn best by seeing, listening and doing. She went on, however the list, does give me a way on how parents see their children, and a starting point for further discussion.
The short story is, the JK teacher was using proven pedagogical practices. In grade 7, I was asked to checked off the items in learning styles. Being a lot more knowledgeable, I turned to the teacher of well over 25 years of experience, and told her, my child learns best seeing, listening and doing. I never did filled out the sheet, but we did have an interesting conversation on the benefits of seeing, listening and doing and what I was doing at home versus what was happening in the classroom.
My point is, teachers with years of experience that my children had, I just realized that they do have a tendency to ignore the fads.
However, when fads become part of the regular practice as learning styles has, it becomes another layer, another obstacle for both the teacher and student. The learning styles are now officially at the senior secondary grades. The students are asked to checked off boxes of preferred learning style modes, usually at the beginning of the year. In one course, the students were held hostage where grades of assignments were not be released until the sheet was filled in. My youngest, came home ranting over it, the check boxes still blank, saying over and over, I learned best by listening, seeing and doing. And she wasn’t the lone wolf. I had a good chuckle, and then asked her to check off all the boxes, and in the space at the bottom of the sheet, write I learned best by listening, seeing and doing. My child exclaimed, “Why did I not think of it myself?” I responded, I am your mother.
On the more serious note, the learning style sheets, the data gleamed on the sheets are being interpreted by the guidance teacher of a high school, whose role has changed dramatically since the 1980s, and more so since the year 2000. Where learning issues have become mental health issues, and as such, it is not the content to extract meaning that manners, nor the weaknesses in reading, writing and numeracy skills. As for the student who are doing well, they speak about their preferred learning style. For my youngest child, who is doing well and has learning issues, she has become a target by the younger, less experienced teachers and the guidance teacher as having self-esteemed issues, and not the underlying reason, hidden from view - her below average reading ability, due to poor word decoding.
What is needed are cognitive scientists in the teacher faculties, but that would mean a change at the top and the thinking of education leaders, who think that teachers are born, and not made.