Donate now

Privacy Policy

Protection of privacy is our first concern, and SQE does not sell or trade information provided by its subscribers or supporters. Your information is used to process donations and newsletter subscriptions, and to contact you about upcoming publications and events.

feed iconRSS Feed

Follow Us
Follow SQESocQualEd
on Twitter

Please note Downloads require you to have the Adobe Reader installed, you can get it here for free Adobe.com

 

 
 
Society for Quality Education

Subscribe to our mailing list

Education is too important to be left to the teachers’ unions

December 03, 2014 by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) at 07:49 AM

In Canada, the teachers' unions are enormously powerful, influencing school board and provincial elections and then using their clout to affect policy. Until recently, the same was true in the US where the teachers' unions ran roughshod over education decisions. However, this column outlines the various legislative and legal measures that are seriously curtailing their power. For example, membership in the biggest teachers' union, the National Education Association, has fallen by 9% since 2011, and it looks as if this trend will continue.

There is good reason to curtail the power of the teachers' unions, as education is too important to be left to the teachers' unions, and this insight is the main rationale for the new laws and rulings in the US. However, there is so far no indication that any Canadian movers and shakers get it.

Share this article

Comments

I agree 100%

Posted by Doug Little on 12/05 at 01:11 AM

Teachers’ unions exist only to serve their own left wing agenda - not the good of the children, nor respect for the parents that public schools are supposed to serve.

Posted by Deanna on 12/07 at 11:28 PM

Of all places, Forbes–widely read by business folk–has a terrific article about why it’s a dumb idea to make a campaign of firing teachers, as “reformers” have. The writer, Nick Morrison, is a regular contributor to Forbes. He quite rightly says that the real problem is keeping and supporting teachers, not firing them.

“While it may excite conservative commentators, this proposal is doomed to fail, not least because firing teachers requires finding replacements, and there is no guarantee they will be any better, if they exist at all.

“But there is another side to this debate, and that is the difficulty of keeping teachers in the classroom. Not just good teachers, but any teachers….

“Teacher retention is a problem familiar to school leaders across education systems. In the U.S. an estimated 40-50% of teachers leave within the first five years and the attrition rates of first year teachers have increased by about a third in the last two decades.

“A report by the House of Commons education committee found similar retention levels in England, while in Australia research suggests almost half of new teachers leave within five years.

“Why are they leaving? The obvious answer might be low pay and student behaviour, but studies in all three countries suggest this is not the case. Instead, the main culprits are lack of support and workload issues.

“The latter is tied into growing levels of accountability in public education. While taxpayers quite rightly want to see that they are getting value for money from schools, this has translated into an increasingly heavy burden on teachers in terms of paperwork.”

It’s good to see common sense in a mainstream publication.

Posted by Doug Little on 12/23 at 06:46 PM

Leave A Comment

Be polite and respectful. Stay on-topic. State your position clearly and write succinctly. Provide support for claims. Don't hog the microphone. Strong opinions are OK, but outrage is not. Don't post just to upset others.

Name:

Email (required but not displayed):

Emotions

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Next entry: Touchscreen Hype

Previous entry: Today is Giving Tuesday